The strange career of the Chevalier d'Eon de Beaumont : $b Minister plenipotentiary from France to Great Britain in 1763Telfer, J. Buchan (John Buchan)
History
The strange career of the Chevalier d'Eon de Beaumont : $b Minister plenipotentiary from France to Great Britain in 1763
Telfer, J. Buchan (John Buchan)
Eon de Beaumont, Charles Geneviève Louis Auguste André Timothée d', 1728-1810; France -- Foreign relations -- 1715-1774
De Sartines had been directed by de Praslin to inquire into the
statements made by Dufour, saying, ‘Nothing essential is to be omitted
this time!’ The officer of police insisted that the woman was of very
doubtful reputation; no evidence, therefore, she was able to adduce could
be accepted, and before involving persons of so high consideration, as
were the de Broglios, in an affair of this kind, it would be necessary
to obtain a written order from the King that he himself, at least, might
be protected against all responsibility. Such pleas were worthy of a
poor perplexed detective, for since the Hugonnet business, de Sartines
felt himself bound, whatever his proper sense of duty, to consult, in
the first place, the sovereign’s private interests and obey his secret
commands, and he discerned, plainly enough, that the present was an
instance which called for the exercise of his utmost discretion and
prudence. Too well persuaded, on his part, of the futility of applying to
the King for the order suggested by the officer of police, de Praslin
had to content himself with a simple re-examination of Dufour, from
whom nothing more was to be learnt, and the summoning of Hugonnet, who
declared his incompetence to supply any kind of information, as the woman
was entirely unknown to him, nor had he ever heard of her. At the close
of the inquiry, de Praslin said: ‘I am not being duped, because, as a
fact, this affair causes me very little anxiety. It is not D’Eon who will
ruin the State.’[234]
[Sidenote: DEATH OF THE COUNT DE GUERCHY.]
Although de Guerchy and D’Eon had become separated never again to meet
on this earth; although their unprofitable bickerings had come to an
end and the time for recriminations was over, to cast each other into
oblivion was too impossible a task for either. Upon his return to France,
de Guerchy entered on a course of persecution, selecting for his victim
D’Eon’s aged mother, who was suddenly deprived of the enjoyment of
certain free tenures, while the taxes on her little estate at Tonnerre
where she was living in quiet retirement, were inordinately increased.
The poor lady was in fact hunted to misery and despair.
‘De Guerchy died at Paris in September 1767 in great anguish of
body and mind. May our merciful God spare his soul in heaven,
as I spared his body on earth!’[235]
D’Eon had sent the count a final challenge in the form of a letter, dated
August 5, 1767, which reached him a few weeks only before his death, when
his youthful son swore that he would some day avenge his father. This
letter, in which all the events of the past were recapitulated, covered
copies of the indictment, of the writ of _certiorari_, and of other
documents connected with his trial in London, and called upon de Guerchy
to justify himself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account