The strange career of the Chevalier d'Eon de Beaumont : $b Minister plenipotentiary from France to Great Britain in 1763Telfer, J. Buchan (John Buchan)
History
The strange career of the Chevalier d'Eon de Beaumont : $b Minister plenipotentiary from France to Great Britain in 1763
Telfer, J. Buchan (John Buchan)
Eon de Beaumont, Charles Geneviève Louis Auguste André Timothée d', 1728-1810; France -- Foreign relations -- 1715-1774
‘... Can the King of France grant to a female a safe-conduct
intended for an officer? Who is it that served the King? Is it
Mademoiselle or M. D’Eon? If his Majesty in learning, but too
late, the offences committed by her parents to the prejudice of
good manners and against the laws, is desirous of forgetting
the past and unwilling to impute to her the fault of having
wilfully persevered in such a course—is it to be expected that
the King’s leniency is to extend to laying to the charge of the
late King the ridicule that attaches to her indecent disguise,
by employing the words she has suggested?... Never has the
King’s service required that a female should usurp the title
of man, the uniform of an officer, the status of an envoy! It
is in thus increasing the number of her rash claims, that this
woman has succeeded in trying the King’s and my own patience
and the good-will of her partisans. Whether she remains in
England or goes elsewhere is, as you well know, a matter of
perfect indifference to us. As to her eagerness to return to
France, I gave her to understand, through you, it was the
King’s desire that she should not do so unless in the character
of her sex, and that she should here lead a quiet, virtuous,
and circumspect life, such as she should never have departed
from.’
Beaumarchais added, that for his own part he did not believe, more
than the minister, that any fresh claims she made could be of the least
advantage to her, and with many kind words expressed his readiness to
serve her as he had hitherto done, provided she did not persist in
creating further difficulties.[325]
This refusal of Louis XVI. to accede to the request made by D’Eon,
reached him at a moment that Morande had successfully defeated all his
plans to punish him. Foiled in his purpose of chastising Morande by
resort to arms, the Chevalier sued him for libel, and Lord Mansfield
directed rule to be granted; but when it was shown that D’Eon had written
equally libellous matter to Morande, the Court discharged the rule,
and the Chevalier had the mortification of seeing his enemy reap the
advantage of his own imprudence. It was whilst smarting under a sense of
these failures that D’Eon wrote to his tormentor:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account