The strange career of the Chevalier d'Eon de Beaumont : $b Minister plenipotentiary from France to Great Britain in 1763Telfer, J. Buchan (John Buchan)
History
The strange career of the Chevalier d'Eon de Beaumont : $b Minister plenipotentiary from France to Great Britain in 1763
Telfer, J. Buchan (John Buchan)
Eon de Beaumont, Charles Geneviève Louis Auguste André Timothée d', 1728-1810; France -- Foreign relations -- 1715-1774
The Chevalier was recalled, and yet expressly forbidden to appear
at Court! There was apprehension lest he should bring to light the
iniquities of which he was the victim! He was greatly moved at the
contents of this letter, for even the despatch he had received some days
previously, through the hands of a secret courier, had scarcely prepared
him for so overwhelming a blow.
_To the Chevalier D’Eon, my Minister Plenipotentiary, London._
‘Versailles, October 4, 1763.
‘You have served me as usefully in the guise of a female as in
the dress you now wear. Reassume it immediately, and withdraw
into the city. I warn you that the King has this day signed,
not with his hand, but with the stamp, the order to compel you
to return to France; but I command you to remain in England,
with all your papers, until such time as you receive further
instructions from me. You are not in safety at your residence,
and here you will find powerful enemies.[124]
‘LOUIS.’
‘I have frequently heard the Chevalier D’Eon repeat to my father,’ says
Madame Campan, ‘the contents of this letter, in which Louis XV. thus
separated his individuality from the person of the King of France. The
Chevalier or Chevalière had kept all the King’s letters ...’[125] yet the
Duke de Broglie refuses to acknowledge its authenticity, and labours to
prove that it is an imposture.[126]
[Sidenote: FORSAKEN?]
No sooner had the Chevalier read de Praslin’s letter than it fell from
his hands. He began to suspect, for the first time, the evils that
menaced him. What was he to hope from the strength of character of a
monarch who deserted him when he had done nothing but obey his commands,
and whose only exhibition of courage consisted in signing away his
downfall with the stamp instead of with the sign-manual. Unable to adopt
and digest the idea that the King would submit himself to the will of
others, and sacrifice one who was dear to him and whom he supported in
secret, the Chevalier concluded that the affixing of a stamped signature
could only have been an act of momentary weakness, a concession to
temporary necessities, and he felt that he should be the more surely
justified, from having been so unjustly condemned. Reflections such
as these gave him courage and hope; he resumed his habitual gaiety,
his usual indifference, and resolved upon adhering to all the King’s
instructions, whatever the damaging situations in which they might place
him. He did not, however, resign himself to this sort of humiliation
without a struggle, being specially sensitive on points of honour and
self-esteem, feelings to which he was prone, and which were readily
excited within him.... He awaited his enemies with resignation, having
made up his mind to yield, step by step, inch by inch, and make them pay
dearly for a triumph he some day hoped to avenge.[127]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account