The Strange Schemes of Randolph MasonPost, Melville Davisson
General
The Strange Schemes of Randolph Mason
Post, Melville Davisson
American fiction -- 19th century; Detective and mystery stories, American; Legal stories, American
"I mean," replied the attorney, "that you have been the dupe of a shrewd
knave who is familiar with the weak places in the law and has resorted
to an ingenious scheme to secure possession of your property without
rendering himself liable to criminal procedure. It is true that if the
diamonds were located you could attach and recover them by a civil
suit, but it is scarcely possible that such a shrewd knave would permit
himself to be caught with the jewels, and it is certain that he has some
reasonably safe method by which he can dispose of them without fear of
detection. He has trapped you and has committed no crime. If you had
the fellow in custody now, the judge would release him the moment an
application was made. The entire matter was only a sale. He bought the
jewels and you trusted him. He is no more a law-breaker than you are. He
is only a sharper dealer."
"But, sir," cried the angry Van Broom, spreading the false letter out on
the table, "that is forged, every word of it. I will send this fellow to
the penitentiary for forgery. I will spend a thousand dollars to catch
him."
"If you should spend a thousand dollars to catch him," said the
attorney, smiling, "you would never be able to send him to the
penitentiary on that paper. It is not forgery."
"Not forgery!" shouted the jeweller, "not forgery, man! The rascal wrote
every word of that letter. He signed the name of Bartholdi & Banks at
the bottom of it. Every word of that paper is false. The company never
heard of it. Here is their telegram."
"Mr. Van Broom," said the public prosecutor, "listen to me, sir. All
that you say is perhaps true. Camden Gerard doubtless wrote the entire
paper and signed the name of Bartholdi & Banks, and presented it to
you for a definite purpose. To such an act men commonly apply the term
forgery, and in the common acceptation of the word it is forgery and a
reprehensible wrong; but legally, the false making of such a paper as
this is not forgery and is no crime. In order to constitute the crime
of forgery, the instrument falsely made must be apparently capable of
effecting a fraud, of being used to the prejudice of another's right. It
must be such as might be of legal efficacy, or might be the foundation
of some legal liability.
"This paper in question, although falsely made, has none of the vital
elements of forgery under the law. If genuine, it would have no legal
validity, as it affects no legal rights. It would merely be an
attempt to receive courtesies on a promise, of no legal obligation, to
reciprocate them; and courtesies have never been held to be the subject
of legal fraud. This is a mere letter of introduction, which, by no
possibility, could subject the supposed writer to any pecuniary loss or
legal liability. It is not a subject of forgery, and its false making is
no crime.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account