The Structure and Life-history of the Cockroach (Periplaneta orientalis): An Introduction to the Study of InsectsMiall, L. C. (Louis Compton)
Science
The Structure and Life-history of the Cockroach (Periplaneta orientalis): An Introduction to the Study of Insects
Miall, L. C. (Louis Compton)
Cockroaches
At the time of hatching the Cockroach resembles its parent in all
essentials, the wings being the only organs which are developed
subsequently, not as entirely new parts, but as extensions of the
lateral edges of the thoracic terga. The mode of life of the young
Cockroach is like that of the adult, and development may be said to
be direct, or with only a trifling amount of metamorphosis. In the
Thysanura even this small post-embryonic change ceases to appear,
and the Insect, when it leaves the egg, differs from its parent
only in size. It is probable that development without metamorphosis
was once the rule among Insects. At present such is by no means the
case. Insects furnish the most familiar and striking, though, as will
appear by-and-by, not the most typical examples of development with
metamorphosis. In many text-books the quiescent pupa and the winged
imago are not unnaturally described as normal stages, which are
exceptionally wanting in Orthoptera, Hemiptera, Thysanura, and other
“ametabolous” Insects. It is, however, really the “holometabolous”
Insects undergoing what is called “complete metamorphosis,” which are
exceptional, deviating not only from such little-specialised orders as
Thysanura and Orthoptera, but from nearly all animals which exhibit a
marked degree of metamorphosis. We shall endeavour to make good this
statement, and to show that the Cockroach is normal in its absence of
conspicuous post-embryonic change, while the Butterfly, Bee, Beetle,
and Gnat are peculiar even among metamorphic animals.
_Animal Metamorphoses._
To investigate the causes of metamorphosis, let us select from the
same sub-kingdom two animals as unlike as possible with respect to the
amount of post-embryonic change to which they are subject. We can find
no better examples than Amphioxus and the Chick.
The newly-hatched Amphioxus is a small, two-layered, hollow sac, which
moves through the sea by the play of cilia which project everywhere
from its outer surface. It is a Gastræa, a little simpler than the
Hydra, and far simpler than a Jelly-fish. As yet it possesses no
nervous system, heart, respiratory organs, or skeleton. The most
expert zoologist, ignorant of its life-history, could not determine
its zoological position. He would most likely guess that it would turn
either into a polyp or a worm.
The Chick, on the other hand, at the tenth day of incubation, is
already a Bird, with feathers, wings, and beak. When it chips the shell
it is a young fowl. It has the skull, the skeleton, the toes, and the
bill characteristic of its kind, and no child would hesitate to call it
a young Bird.
Amphioxus is, therefore, a Vertebrate (if for shortness we may so name
a creature without vertebræ, brain, or skull), which develops with
metamorphosis, being at first altogether unlike its parent. The Chick
is a Vertebrate which develops directly, without metamorphosis. Let us
now ask what other peculiarities go with this difference in mode of
development.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account