The Structure and Life-history of the Cockroach (Periplaneta orientalis): An Introduction to the Study of InsectsMiall, L. C. (Louis Compton)
Science
The Structure and Life-history of the Cockroach (Periplaneta orientalis): An Introduction to the Study of Insects
Miall, L. C. (Louis Compton)
Cockroaches
CRUSTACEA usually pass through well-marked phases. _Peneus_ presents
five stages of growth (including the adult), the earlier being common
to many lower Crustacea. The Crab passes through three, beginning with
the third of _Peneus_; the Lobster through two; while the freshwater
Crayfish, when hatched, is already in the fifth and last.
FISHES seldom undergo any post-embryonic change amounting to
metamorphosis. _Amphioxus_ (if _Amphioxus_ be indeed a fish) is the
only well-marked case.
AMPHIBIA develop without conspicuous metamorphosis, except in the case
of the Frogs and Toads (Anura), which begin life as aquatic, tailed,
gill-bearing, and footless tadpoles.
REPTILES, BIRDS, and MAMMALS do not undergo transformation.
This survey, hasty as it necessarily is, shows that habitat is
a material circumstance. Larval stages are apt to be suppressed
in fluviatile and terrestrial forms. Further, it would seem that
zoological rank is not without influence. Metamorphosis is absent in
Cephalopoda, the highest class of Mollusca, and in all but the lowest
Vertebrates, while it is almost universal in Cœlenterates, Echinoderms,
and Lamellibranchs.
It has often been remarked that the quantity of food-yolk indicates
the course of development. If a large store of food has been laid up
for the young animal, it can continue its growth without any effort
of its own, and it leaves the egg well equipped for the battle of
life. Where there is little or no yolk, the embryo is turned out in an
ill-furnished condition to seek its own food. This early liberation
implies metamorphosis, for the small and feeble larva must make use of
temporary organs. Some very simple locomotive appendages are almost
universally needed, to enable it to get away from the place of its
birth, which is usually stocked with as much life as it can support.
Some animals, therefore, are like well-to-do people, who can provide
their children with food, clothes, schooling, and pocket-money. Their
fortunate offspring grow at ease, and are not driven to premature
exercise of their limbs or wits. Others are like starving families,
which are forced to send their children to sell matches or newspapers
in the streets. It is a question of the amount of capital or
accumulated food which is at command.
The connection between zoological rank and the absence of metamorphosis
is also explained by what we see among men. High zoological position
ordinarily implies strength or intelligence, and the strong and knowing
can do better for their offspring than the puny and sluggish. It does
not cost a Shark or a quadruped too much to hatch its young in its
own body, while Spiders and Earwigs,[187] which are among the highest
Invertebrates, defend their progeny, as do Mammals and Birds, the
highest Vertebrates.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account