The Student's Elements of GeologyLyell, Charles, Sir
Science
The Student's Elements of Geology
Lyell, Charles, Sir
Geology
When told that the new dredgings prove that “we are still living in the
Chalk Period,” we naturally ask whether some cuttle-fish has been found
with a Belemnite forming part of its internal framework; or have
Ammonites, Baculites, Hamites, Turrilites, with four or five other
Cephalopodous genera characteristic of the chalk and unknown as
tertiary, been met with in the abysses of the ocean? Or, in the absence
of these long-extinct forms, has a single spiral univalve, or species
of Cretaceous Gasteropod, been found living? Or, to descend still lower
in the scale, has some characteristic Cretaceous genus of
Lamellibranchiate Bivalve, such as the Inoceramus, or Hippurite,
foreign to the Tertiary seas, been proved to have survived down to our
time? Or, of the numerous genera of lamellibranchiates common to the
Cretaceous and Recent seas, has one species been found living? The
answer to all these questions is—not one has been found. Even of the
humblest shell-fish, the Brachiopods, no new species common to the
Cretaceous and recent seas has yet been met with. It has been very
generally admitted by conchologists that out of a hundred species of
this tribe occurring fossil in the Upper Chalk—one, and one only,
_Terebratulina striata,_ is still living, being thought to be identical
with _Terebratula caput-serpentis._ Although this identity is still
questioned by some naturalists of authority, it would certainly not
surprise us if another lamp-shell of equal antiquity should be met with
in the deep sea.
Had it been declared that we are living in the Eocene epoch, the idea
would not be so extravagant, for the great reptiles of the Upper Chalk,
the Mosasaurus, Pliosaurus, and Pterodactyle, and many others, as well
as so many genera of chambered univalves, had already disappeared from
the earth, and the marine fauna had made a greater approach to our own
by nearly the entire difference which separates it from the fauna of
the Cretaceous seas. The Eocene nummulitic limestone of Egypt is a rock
mainly composed, like the more ancient white chalk, of globigerine mud;
and if the reader will refer to what we have said of the extent to
which the nummulitic marine strata, formed originally at the bottom of
the sea, now enter into the frame-work of mountain chains of the
principal continents, he will at once perceive that the present
Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian Oceans are geographical terms, which must
be wholly without meaning when applied to the Eocene, and still more to
the Cretaceous Period; so that to talk of the chalk having been
uninterruptedly forming in the Atlantic from the Cretaceous Period to
our own, is as inadmissible in a geographical as in a geological sense.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account