The Student's Elements of GeologyLyell, Charles, Sir
Science
The Student's Elements of Geology
Lyell, Charles, Sir
Geology
The first column marks the last appearance of several genera which are
characteristic of Palæozoic strata. The second shows those genera which
are characteristic of the Upper Trias, either as peculiar to it, or, as
in the three cases marked by asterisks, reaching their maximum of
development at this era. The third column marks the first appearance in
Triassic rocks of genera destined to become more abundant in later
ages.
It is only, however, when we contemplate the number of species by which
each of the above-mentioned genera are represented that we comprehend
the peculiarities of what is commonly called the St. Cassian fauna.
Thus, for example, the Ammonite, which is not common to older rocks, is
represented by no less than seventy-three species; whereas Loxonema,
which is only known as common to older rocks, furnishes fifteen
Triassic species. Cerithium, so abundant in tertiary strata, and which
still lives, is represented by no less than fourteen species. As the
Orthoceras had never been met with in the marine Muschelkalk, much
surprise was naturally felt that seven or eight species of the genus
should appear in the Hallstadt beds, assuming these last to belong to
the Upper Trias. Among these species are some of large dimensions,
associated with large Ammonites with foliated lobes, a form never seen
before so low in the series, while the Orthoceras had never been seen
so high.
On the whole, the rich marine fauna of Hallstadt and St. Cassian, now
generally assigned to the lowest members of the Upper Trias or Keuper,
leads us to suspect that when the strata of the Triassic age are better
known, especially those belonging to the period of the Bunter
sandstone, the break between the Palæozoic and Mesozoic Periods may be
almost effaced. Indeed some geologists are not yet satisfied that the
true position of the St. Cassian beds (containing so great an admixture
of types, having at once both Mesozoic and Palæozoic affinities) is
made out, and doubt whether they have yet been clearly proved to be
newer than the Muschelkalk.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account