In sinking a shaft, danger is to be apprehended both from the falling in
of loose and incoherent strata, and from the lateral springs, which
sometimes empty themselves into the workings to an extent which it would
at first appear hopeless to contend against. In such cases there is no
safety to be obtained without walling the shaft with brick or stone, or
securing it by timber or metal tubbing. For this purpose many of our
coal pits were formerly lined throughout with three-inch boards, nailed
to a circular wooden framework called a crib, which was firmly attached
to the sides of the pit at convenient distances. But this method,
although it has been known to keep out a pressure of water equal to 100
pounds on the square inch, is not considered so safe as the metal
tubbing now adopted in all difficult works. In comparatively solid
ground the cast-iron tubs are forced down the shaft, but in soft ground
they sink by their own weight. As they descend, fresh tubs are added,
until the work is finished. When we consider that, in the coal-pits in
the north of England, many shafts have a diameter of as much as fifteen
feet, that in some cases they are sunk to a depth of nearly 300 fathoms,
and that, under the most favourable circumstances, even where tubbing is
not required to guard against the influx of springs, it is necessary to
line almost the whole of the interior with bricks, to prevent the loose
strata from falling or being washed in, we cannot wonder that as much as
100,000l. and ten years of labour have, in some cases, been expended
before the seam of coal has been reached that was to repay all this vast
outlay of capital and time. Unsightly and filthy as such a shaft may be,
it is in reality a great triumph of architectural skill.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account