This great catastrophe gave the Emperor Titus a fine opportunity for
displaying the benevolence which entitled him to be called ‘the delight
of mankind.’ He immediately hastened to the scene of destruction,
appointed guardians of consular rank to distribute among the needy
survivors the property of those who had perished without heirs; and
encouraged the weak-hearted, assisting them by liberal donations, until
a no less terrible misfortune recalled him to Rome, where a fire, which
laid almost half the town in ashes, was followed by a plague, which, for
some time, daily swept away thousands.
It has often been asked how so many of the relics buried in Herculaneum
and Pompeii could have been so perfectly preserved as to form a Museum
of the Past for the admiration and instruction of future ages. A stream
of lava would undoubtedly have consumed everything on its fiery track,
but, fortunately for posterity, it was not a flood of molten stone, but
a current of mud which overwhelmed the devoted cities. We learn from
history that a heavy shower of sand, pumice, and lapilli was ejected by
Vesuvius for eight successive days and nights, in the year 79,
accompanied by violent rains, and thus all these volcanic matters were
converted into mud-streams, which, rushing down the sides of the
mountain, descended upon Herculaneum and Pompeii. This circumstance
satisfactorily explains how the _interior_ of the buildings, with all
the underground vaults and cellars, was filled up, and how all the
objects they contained could be as perfectly moulded as in a plaster
cast by the muddy alluvium, which subsequently hardened into pumice
tuff. Hence this wonderful preservation of paintings, which, shielded
from the destructive influence of the atmosphere, still retained their
original freshness of colour when again brought to light by a late
generation; these rolls of papyrus which it has been found possible to
decipher; this perfect cast of a woman’s form, with a child in her arms!
No lava has flowed over Pompeii since that city was buried, but with
Herculaneum the case is different. Although the substance which fills
the interior of the buildings in that doomed city must have been
introduced in a state of mud like that found in similar situations in
Pompeii, yet the superincumbent mass differs wholly in composition and
thickness.
Herculaneum was situated several miles nearer to the volcano, and has,
therefore, been always more liable to be covered, not only by showers of
ashes, but by alluvium and streams of lava. Accordingly, masses of both
have accumulated on each other above the ancient site of the city, to a
depth of nowhere less than 70, and in many places of 112 feet; while the
depth of the bed of ashes under which Pompeii lies buried seldom exceeds
12 or 14 feet above the houses, and it is even said that the higher part
of the amphitheatre always projected above the surface.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account