The Suffragette: The History of the Women's Militant Suffrage Movement, 1905-1910Pankhurst, E. Sylvia (Estelle Sylvia)
History
The Suffragette: The History of the Women's Militant Suffrage Movement, 1905-1910
Pankhurst, E. Sylvia (Estelle Sylvia)
Women -- Suffrage -- Great Britain
On November 12th, Mr. Birrell spoke at the City Temple, the church of
Mr. R. J. Campbell, the well-known initiator of the so-called "New
Theology." It was well known that the Suffragettes were present to
heckle him, and the chairman tried to deter them by stating that Mr.
Birrell had promised to give his "influential support to any measure
giving a liberal extension of the franchise to women." The Suffragettes
considered that this meant absolutely nothing at all, and continued to
protest as earnestly as they could. The result was a terrible scene of
violence, in which large numbers of women were flung out of the church
and dragged down the steps. The W. S. P. U. afterwards wrote to Mr.
Birrell to ask what his statement had really meant. His answer, given
through his Secretary, was simply and solely that he had "nothing to
add to the reply which he gave recently to a deputation introduced by
Miss Kenney."
Meanwhile, though the militant tactics were being condemned as
vigorously as ever, sympathy for the militants and a desire for the
franchise were rapidly spreading amongst women of all shades of
opinion. The Women's Conservative and Unionist Franchise Society was
formed about this time, and the Margate and the Wallasey Women's
Liberal Associations passed Resolutions dissolving themselves until
women were enfranchised, whilst the Secretaries and Committee members
of other associations resigned their posts on the same ground.
At this point Mr. Lloyd George wrote to the executive of the Women's
Liberal Federation offering to speak for them on Women's Suffrage in
the Albert Hall. They agreed to his suggestion and it was announced
that he would make a Government pronouncement. On this ground the
organisers of the meeting approached the Committee of the W. S. P. U.,
asking that the Chancellor of the Exchequer should not be heckled, but
we replied that unless we had an assurance that Mr. Lloyd George's
pronouncement was to contain a Government promise to act, we could not
comply with this request. As requests that we would alter our decision
continued to pour in, Mrs. Tuke, our Honorary Secretary, wrote to Mr.
Lloyd George on November 30th, stating that we would gladly ask our
women not to interrupt him if he could assure us that the Government
were really prepared to do something for the Suffrage Cause, and that,
if he wished, we would pledge ourselves not to divulge his reply until
after his speech had been delivered. Mr. George's only answer was a
curt note stating that anything that he had to say in regard to the
Government's attitude would be said in the course of his speech in the
Albert Hall.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account