The Suffragette: The History of the Women's Militant Suffrage Movement, 1905-1910Pankhurst, E. Sylvia (Estelle Sylvia)
History
The Suffragette: The History of the Women's Militant Suffrage Movement, 1905-1910
Pankhurst, E. Sylvia (Estelle Sylvia)
Women -- Suffrage -- Great Britain
A measure called the Public Meeting Bill providing that any person who
acted in a disorderly manner in order to prevent the transaction of
the business for which a meeting had been called together should be
rendered liable to a fine not exceeding £5 or to imprisonment for a
period not exceeding one month, was therefore laid before Parliament by
Lord Robert Cecil. As the slightest interjection or the most pertinent
question by a Suffragette had now become the signal for a scene of
disturbance, it was clearly apparent that they would not be able to
raise their voices at the meetings of Cabinet Ministers without
rendering themselves liable to the suggested penalties. Though the
Bill was introduced but a few days before the end of the Session, the
Government at once provided for it the facilities which had been denied
to that equally short measure to enfranchise the women of the country,
and it was quickly rushed through the two Houses and became law before
the end of the year.
Party feeling on the one hand, and public indifference on the other,
veiled for the time being the serious and revolutionary nature of this
measure and allowed it to be placed on the statute book with scarcely
a word of discussion or protest. Nevertheless it struck at one of
our most ancient and fundamental national customs. Describing the
ancient governmental assemblies of the Saxon peoples Tacitus explains
that though, as a rule, only the more distinguished members of the
community put forward new proposals, all had a right to be present
and the by-standers at once expressed their opinion in regard to all
suggestions. He says:
The eldest opens the proceedings, then each man speaks according as
distinguished by age, family, renown in war or eloquence. No one
commands, only the personal dignity residing in him exercises its
influence. No distinction of rank exists; the Assembly determines
and its determination is law. Proposals, when deemed acceptable, are
hailed with loud acclaim and clash of arms. A loud shout of dissent
rejects what appears to be unacceptable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account