The Suffragette: The History of the Women's Militant Suffrage Movement, 1905-1910Pankhurst, E. Sylvia (Estelle Sylvia)
History
The Suffragette: The History of the Women's Militant Suffrage Movement, 1905-1910
Pankhurst, E. Sylvia (Estelle Sylvia)
Women -- Suffrage -- Great Britain
Two further events must be chronicled before closing the story of the
year 1908. The first is the fight of the Scottish women graduates for
the recognition of their claim to vote under the Scottish University
Franchise which they carried right through to the House of Lords.
Though they failed to establish their claim, they yet brought to light
many valuable new facts in regard to the rights and privileges of their
countrywomen in ancient times. One of their contentions was that the
question as to whether they might vote should be decided according to
the actual wording of the University Franchise Act and not according
to the known, or supposed, intentions of Parliament, for that is the
rule which the British Courts have agreed to be always the just
and proper one to adopt. There was nothing in the words of the Act
to prevent women graduates from voting on equal terms with men, and
even if it were held that this had happened because when the Act was
passed the legislature had not foreseen the possibility of there ever
being women graduates, the right course to pursue (because it was the
accepted course when such questions in regard to Acts of Parliament
arose) was for the women to be allowed to vote until Parliament, if
it chose to do so, should carry an amending statute. The graduates
pointed out that this had been done in the case of the first woman who
had graduated in medicine, in the Netherlands where, as in England,
graduation carried with it the right to vote. This lady had claimed her
right and not being allowed to exercise it had taken her case to the
Courts. For technical reasons the case had been postponed and during
the postponement the Legislature had brought in a repealing enactment
to prevent women graduates voting and had succeeded in carrying it.
The reason for the refusal of the English authorities to take this
course is clearly apparent, for it would have been difficult indeed for
our Parliament to carry such a repealing measure in the face of the
tremendous Suffragette and Suffragist agitation.
The second of these two important happenings and perhaps the most
auspicious one of the whole year, was the granting of votes to women in
Victoria where, after struggling for many years, the Suffragists had at
length succeeded in inducing their Government to take the matter up and
had secured their enfranchisement on November 18th, 1908.
FOOTNOTES:
[32] Miss Ogston acted upon her own initiative in using the dog whip,
and her intention was not known to the committee of the W. S. P. U. who
felt, however, that they could not condemn her for seeking to protect
herself. She employed the whip as a protest, not against ejection, but
against the unnecessary violence to which she herself and other women
had been subjected.
CHAPTER XIX
JANUARY TO MARCH, 1909
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account