Among the seven governmental experts sent to investigate the repairs
and report on their soundness, there was one who strenuously challenged
the views of his colleagues. While the other six agreed that the damage
had been remedied beyond possibility of a further disturbance, the
seventh (Peliades by name) brought in a vigorous minority report in
which he contended that the relief was only temporary.
His plea, as I remember it, ran somewhat as follows:
“For four or five years--possibly for ten--the repairs will prove
adequate; but after that period the damage will re-appear in a much
more aggravated form than before. For the cement constitutes a foreign
element in the glass, and produces an abnormal bulge, so placing an
exceptional strain upon those portions which are still sound. For a
while the wall may be able to endure the strain, but in the course
of time the additional tension will become too great for the brittle
material of the wall to resist; and first small cracks will appear, and
then larger, growing by inches and by fractions of inches, until the
break spreads towards the surface, and the tremendous pressure of the
ocean shatters the remaining barrier. This effect, of course, will take
years before it begins to be noticeable; but when finally it becomes
apparent, the crack will have spread so far that only heroic measures
will be able to save Atlantis.
“The remedy, therefore, is to undertake the immediate erection of a
new glass bulwark against the affected portion of the wall. Prodigious
though this effort will necessarily be, we will probably be able to
complete the work in time. But unless we do complete it, we will find
ourselves within a hair’s breadth of catastrophe.”
Unfortunately--most unfortunately, in view of what ensued--Peliades’
warning was scarcely heeded. In some quarters he was denounced as a
crank, a mad alarmist; in other quarters he was openly laughed at,
or derided as the victim of hysteria; while the majority paid no
attention to him at all. Least sympathetic of his hearers were his
fellow specialists; for these, in response to an inquiry by the High
Chief Adviser, testified at length as to the scientific unsoundness of
Peliades’ theories, and disproved his views to their own satisfaction
and that of the people.
And so the dissenter’s motions were quietly tabled, and Atlantis
returned to its normal duties with confidence in the future.
CHAPTER XXIX
The Party of Emergence
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account