The Suppression of the African Slave Trade to the United States of America: 1638-1870Du Bois, W. E. B. (William Edward Burghardt)
History
The Suppression of the African Slave Trade to the United States of America: 1638-1870
Du Bois, W. E. B. (William Edward Burghardt)
Slave trade -- United States -- History
[39] _House Reports_, 18 Cong. 2 sess. I. No. 70; _Amer. State
Papers, Foreign_, V. No. 379, pp. 364-5, No. 414, p. 783, etc.
Among the nations invited by the United States to co-operate
in suppressing the trade was the United States of Colombia.
Mr. Anderson, our minister, expressed "the certain belief that
the Republic of Colombia will not permit herself to be behind
any Government in the civilized world in the adoption of
energetic measures for the suppression of this disgraceful
traffic": _Ibid._, No. 407, p. 729. The little republic
replied courteously; and, as a _projet_ for a treaty, Mr.
Anderson offered the proposed English treaty of 1824,
including the Senate amendments. Nevertheless, the treaty thus
agreed to was summarily rejected by the Senate, March 9, 1825:
_Ibid._, p. 735. Another result of this general invitation of
the United States was a proposal by Colombia that the
slave-trade and the status of Hayti be among the subjects for
discussion at the Panama Congress. As a result of this, a
Senate committee recommended that the United States take no
part in the Congress. This report was finally disagreed to by
a vote of 19 to 24: _Ibid._, No. 423, pp. 837, 860, 876, 882.
[40] _British and Foreign State Papers_, 1823-4, and 1826-7.
Brazil abolished the trade in 1830.
[41] This treaty was further defined in 1833: _Ibid._, 1830-1,
p. 641 ff.; 1832-3, p. 286 ff.
[42] _Ibid._, 1833-4, pp. 218 ff., 1059 ff.
[43] _Ibid._, 1837-8, p. 268 ff.
[44] _Ibid._, 1838-9, p. 792 ff.
[45] Viz., Feb. 28, 1825; April 7, 1830; Feb. 16, 1831; March
3, 1831. The last resolution passed the House: _House
Journal_, 21 Cong. 2 sess. pp. 426-8.
[46] Cf. _House Doc._, 26 Cong. 2 sess. V. No. 115, pp. 35-6,
etc.; _House Reports_, 27 Cong. 3 sess. III. No. 283, pp.
730-55, etc.
[47] These were the celebrated cases of the "Encomium,"
"Enterprize," and "Comet." Cf. _Senate Doc._, 24 Cong. 2 sess.
II. No. 174; 25 Cong. 3 sess. III. No. 216. Cf. also case of
the "Creole": _Ibid._, 27 Cong. 2 sess. II.-III. Nos. 51, 137.
[48] _Ibid._, 26 Cong. 2 sess. IV. No. 179; _Senate Exec.
Doc._, 31 Cong. 2 sess. III. No. 29; 32 Cong. 2 sess. III. No.
19; _Senate Reports_, 31 Cong. 2 sess. No. 301; 32 Cong. 1
sess. I. No. 158; 35 Cong. 1 sess. I. No. 36; _House Doc._, 26
Cong. 1 sess. IV. No. 185; 27 Cong. 3 sess. V. No. 191; 28
Cong. 1 sess. IV. No. 83; _House Exec. Doc._, 32 Cong. 2 sess.
III. No. 20; _House Reports_, 26 Cong. 2 sess. No. 51; 28
Cong. 1 sess. II. No. 426; 29 Cong. 1 sess. IV. No. 753; also
Decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court, _15 Peters_, 518. Cf.
Drake, _Revelations of a Slave Smuggler_, p. 98.
[49] _British and Foreign State Papers_, 1834-5, p. 136.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account