Moreover, the fundamental points on which the bursting and compression theories are grounded are based on erroneous principles. The skull cannot in any sense be regarded as a sphere, nor does it possess the requisite elasticity to bulge and allow of compression in the manner that the theory demands. The skull, in reality, forms rather less than two-thirds of a sphere, the base passing inwards from the lower limits of this partial sphere in a more or less horizontal plane. This can be readily verified by placing the skull on a table so that its base corresponds to the surface of the table. The elastic properties of the skull have also been greatly exaggerated, and far too little attention has been paid to the peculiar anatomical formation of the base. (_c_) =The contre-coup theories.= Fractures of the base occasionally occur in which evidence is conclusive that the blow was received on the vault, the vault itself remaining uninjured. Such cases have given origin to this theory, one stating that ‘from the point struck a wave is transmitted through the semi-fluid brain, producing a fracture at some more distant point’. Helferich, for instance, maintains that isolated fractures of the orbital roof, and more rarely of other parts of the base, are produced by the influence of hydrostatic pressure. There can be no question that waves are transmitted through the brain and cerebro-spinal fluid, but that such waves should be capable of producing a basic fracture is, in my opinion, beyond the bounds of possibility. The theory is opposed to all my experience of basic fractures, and the cases brought forward in support are capable of a much more probable explanation. The base is undoubtedly the weakest part of the skull, and a blow on the vault may fail to produce a local lesion and yet, when the force is transmitted to the weaker base, may there bring about a more definite result. For instance, it is by no means uncommon to find that a blow on the frontal region fails to fracture the vertical plate of that bone and yet suffices to produce a fracture, often comminuted, of the orbital plate of the frontal bone or of the cribriform plate of the ethmoid, two fragile plates, either of which may shatter like a plate of glass from the effect of forces transmitted across them. In further support of this theory, the following case, recently under my care, may be cited. The patient received a heavy blow over the left occipital region. A fracture passed inwards across the left cerebellar fossa towards the posterior border of the foramen magnum, and a second fracture, entirely distinct from the first, passed across the right orbital plate of the frontal bone. In this case, the force conducted across the base, from behind forwards, failed to fracture the strong basi-occiput, but succeeded in producing a more definite lesion on reaching the fragile orbital plate.