London (England) -- Description and travel; London (England) -- History -- 16th century -- Sources; London (England) -- Surveys
These fishmongers were sometimes of two several companies, to wit,
Stock-fishmongers and Salt-fishmongers, of whose antiquity I read, that
by the name of fishmongers of London, they were, for forestalling,
etc., contrary to the laws and constitutions of the city, fined to the
king at five hundred marks, the 18th of King Edward I. More, that the
said fishmongers, hearing of the great victory obtained by the same
king against the Scots, in the 26th of his reign, made a triumphant
and solemn show through the city, with divers pageants, and more than
one thousand horsemen, etc., as in the chapter of sports and pastimes.
These two companies of stock-fishmongers and salt-fishmongers of old
time had their several halls; to wit, in Thames street twain, in New
Fish street twain, and in Old Fish street twain: in each place one for
either company, in all six several halls, the company was so great, as I
have read, and can prove by records. These fishmongers having been jolly
citizens, and six mayors of their company in the space of twenty-four
years; to wit, Walter Turke, 1350; John Lofkin, 1359; John Wroth, 1361;
John Pechie, 1362; Simon Morden, 1369; and William Walworth, 1374. It
followed that in the year 1382, through the counsel of John Northampton,
draper, then being mayor, William Essex, John More, mercer, and Richard
Northburie, the said fishmongers were greatly troubled, hindered of
their liberties, and almost destroyed by congregations made against
them, so that in a parliament at London the controversy depending
between the mayor and aldermen of London, and the fishmongers there,
Nicholas Exton, speaker for the fishmongers, prayeth the king to receive
him and his company into his protection, for fear of corporal hurt:
whereupon it was commanded, either part to keep the peace, on pain
of losing all they had; hereupon, a fishmonger, starting up, replied
that the complaint brought against them by the movers, etc., was but
matter of malice, for that the fishmongers, in the reign of Edward
III., being chief officers of the city, had for their misdemeanors then
done, committed the chief exhibitors of those petitions to prison. In
this parliament the fishmongers, by the king’s charter patents, were
restored to their liberties; notwithstanding in the year next following,
to wit, 1383, John Cavendish, fishmonger, craveth the peace against the
chancellor of England, which was granted, and he put in sureties the
Earls of Stafford and Salisburie. Cavendish challengeth the chancellor
for taking of a bribe of ten pounds for favour of his case, which the
chancellor by oath upon the sacrament avoideth. In further trial it
was found that the chancellor’s man, without his master’s privity, had
taken it; whereupon Cavendish was adjudged to prison, and to pay the
chancellor one thousand marks for slandering him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account