London (England) -- Description and travel; London (England) -- History -- 16th century -- Sources; London (England) -- Surveys
This tower or castle thus destroyed, stood, as it may seem, where now
standeth the house called Bridewell. For notwithstanding the destruction
of the said castle or tower, the house remained large, so that the kings
of this realm long after were lodged there, and kept their courts; for
until the 9th year of Henry III. the courts of law and justice were
kept in the king’s house, wheresoever he was lodged, and not elsewhere.
And that the kings have been lodged, and kept their law courts in this
place, I could show you many authors of record, but for plain proof
this one may suffice. “_Hæc est finalis concordia, facta in Curia
Domini regis apud Sanct. Bridgid. London. a die Sancti Michaelis in
15 dies, Anno regni regis Johannis 7. coram G. Fil. Petri. Eustachio
de Fauconberg, Johanne de Gestlinge, Osbart filio Hervey, Walter De
Crisping Justiciar. et aliis baronibus Domini regis._”[86] More, as
Matthew Paris hath, about the year 1210, King John, in the 12th of his
reign, summoned a parliament at St. Bride’s in London, where he exacted
of the clergy and religious persons the sum of one hundred thousand
pounds; and besides all this, the white monks were compelled to cancel
their privileges, and to pay forty thousand pounds to the king, etc.
This house of St. Bride’s of latter time being left, and not used by the
kings, fell to ruin, insomuch that the very platform thereof remained
for great part waste, and, as it were, but a laystall of filth and
rubbish; only a fair well remained there. A great part of this house,
namely, on the west, as hath been said, was given to the Bishop of
Salisbury; the other part towards the east remaining waste until King
Henry VIII. built a stately and beautiful house thereupon, giving it to
name Bridewell, of the parish and well there. This house he purposely
built for the entertainment of the Emperor Charles V., who in the year
1522 came into this city, as I have showed in my Summary, Annals, and
large Chronicles.
On the north-west side of the city, near unto Redcross street, there
was a tower, commonly called Barbican, or Burhkenning; for that the
same being placed on a high ground, and also built of some good height,
was in old time as a watch-tower for the city, from whence a man might
behold and view the whole city towards the south, and also into Kent,
Sussex, and Surrey, and likewise every other way, east, north, or west.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account