The Swedish-Norwegian Union Crisis: A History with DocumentsNordlund, Karl
History
The Swedish-Norwegian Union Crisis: A History with Documents
Nordlund, Karl
Norway -- Politics and government -- 1814-1905; Sweden - -Politics and government -- 1814-1905
According to notification made in the "Post-och Inrikes Tidningar" of
April 6, this year, the Crown-Prince Regent has on the 5th of the same
month in Joint Swedish and Norwegian Cabinet Council made the following
declaration:
[-- -- --]
Whereas, through the exhortation thus addressed by the Crown-Prince
Regent to the Cabinet Councils of the United Kingdoms, a suggestion of
new negotiations has been made, which ought to be able to lead to such a
solution of the Union affairs as may be approved of by both peoples, and
whereas the present state of things seems to occasion the Riksdag to give
already its opinion on the matter, we move,
that the Riksdag, in an address to His Majesty, may announce its
support of the declaration made by the Crown-Prince Regent in Joint
Swedish and Norwegian Cabinet Council on April 5th this year with a
view to bring about negotiations between the Swedish and Norwegian
Governments concerning, a new arrangement of the Union affairs.
Stockholm, April 12, 1905.
_Gustaf Ax. Berg._ _Gottfrid Billing._ _Gustaf Bjoerlin._
_Hj. Palmstierna._ _Fredrik Pettersson._ _Gust. Tamm._
_R. Toernebladh._ _Wilh. Wallden._
14.
Motion on the Union question in the Second Chamber of the Swedish
Riksdag.
The declaration made by the Crown-Prince Regent in Joint Cabinet Council
of the 5th inst. and published the day after in the "Post-och Inrikes
Tidningar", has given great satisfaction to us and certainly also to
other friends of the Union, to whom the relation arisen between the
sister countries after the failure of the consular negotiations, has
caused a great deal of anxiety. That new negotiations if brought about,
will have a decisive influence on the future of the Union, is obvious.
The worth of the Union, as well as the prospect of maintaining it for a
considerable time to come, depend upon the two peoples voluntary
adherence to it in the conviction that the Union involves advantages well
worth of those restrictions in each peoples absolute right of self
determination as are necessarily conditioned by it. Again, the failure of
the negotiations would evidently produce among the two peoples a general
and settled opinion that an arrangement satisfactory to both cannot be
found within the Union, and such a conviction is sure to undermine its
existence.
Because of this, it proves to be of importance for the Riksdag not to
pass in silence the suggestion of negotiations given in the
above-mentioned declaration, but to second it, if found satisfactory.
It seems to us that the Riksdag should not hesitate to take the latter
alternative, since the declaration, while holding in wiew the necessary
communion in the management of Foreign affairs and in the two peoples'
control of it, at the same time in consideration of its latter portion,
has the bearing that it should not preclude the possibility to attain a
solution satisfactory to both peoples.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account