The Swedish-Norwegian Union Crisis: A History with DocumentsNordlund, Karl
History
The Swedish-Norwegian Union Crisis: A History with Documents
Nordlund, Karl
Norway -- Politics and government -- 1814-1905; Sweden - -Politics and government -- 1814-1905
In a legislative sense the two peoples are hereafter separated. But the
Storthing has a certain conviction that happy and confidential relations
will arise to the benefit of the interests of both. If the above
statement can find support, without prejudice and without bitterness, the
Storthing is firmly convinced that what has now happened will be to the
lasting happiness of Europe. On behalf of the welfare of the countries of
the North, the Storthing addresses this appeal to the people who, by
their magnanimity and chivalry, have won such a prominent place in the
ranks of Nations.
* * * * *
Transcriber's notes
There are many typographical and orthographical errors in the original.
They are listed below. No corrections have been made.
Storthing is sometimes spelled Storting; the use of apostrophes for
possessives is inconsistent; and a number of words are inconsistently
hyphenated. Neither these nor the frequent neologisms are noted
explicitly.
Title page
Ph D.
Table of Contents
Consular Negatiations
Footnote 2-3
that it has confered
Page 4
which outworldly represents
Footnote 4-1
the more pernicous
Page 5
political ascendency chauvinistic strongwords
Page 7
They may have complain
in the Committe of 1898
Page 8
represented in they the in administration
Footnote 10-1
Ministeral Council
Page 11
policy of whech
Page 12
Government Departements
Page 16
by which the Ministery
Footnote 18-1
wherevy it became incumbent
Page 21
January 21et 1902
an disciplinary
Footnote 23-2 is missing a full stop at the end.
Page 25
which decribes
Page 27
Buth it may nevertheless
Page 30
Norwegian gouvernment
Page 31
Swedish governement
Page 32, side note
Mr Bostrom's
Page 33, "Coun" omitted before "cil" at the start of the page
Footnote 33-2
Foreign conntry
Page 34
remedy the deficiences
Page 36
tone is one af decision
Footnote 36-2 is missing a full stop at the end.
Page 38, side note
accusations aganist
Page 38
illwill against Sweden
Formally, therfore,
Page 40
the breaking op
was prowed by
Page 43
an disciplinary sense
Footnote 45-2
frame this laws
Page 46
are unnessary
Page 47
There is a missing a full stop after "rouse their passions"
Footnote 47-1
as questions refering
Page 48
One symtom of this
the tumultuons confusion
Page 50
disssolution of the Union
a document adressed
There is a missing full stop after "appointed by the Storthing"
Page 51
Therfore the way
und Mr LOeVLAND
Page 52
for the establisment
Page 53
cause for displeausure
Page 55
whole of the procedings
Page 58 side note
There is a missing full stop after "27th May 1905"
Page 59 side note
27nd May
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account