The Swedish Revolution Under Gustavus VasaWatson, Paul Barron
History
The Swedish Revolution Under Gustavus Vasa
Watson, Paul Barron
Gustav I Vasa, King of Sweden, 1496-1560; Sweden -- History -- Gustav I Vasa, 1523-1560
stood, however, it seemed poor policy to claim them. These are the
monarch's words: "Some of your fellow-townsmen have let us understand
that taxes have been laid on you for which you are in no wise liable. We
have already written you that you are to be free therefrom; but that
letter, we now are told, has never reached you. God knows we grieve
extremely that any such burden should have been imposed against our wish
and orders, and we hereby notify you that we shall not claim these taxes
laid on you by Mehlen." Simultaneously with this document others of like
tenor were despatched to other persons to allay their wrath.[111]
These summary proceedings of Gustavus made Mehlen more ready to accept
proposals from the other side; and he was further impelled in that
direction by recent plots among the Dalesmen. The insurrection under
Sunnanväder, which the monarch had fancied he could extinguish by a
generous supply of salt, had not yet yielded to the treatment. Indeed,
according to the best reports, the malady had spread. How serious the
insurrection was, appears from the frequency of the monarch's
exhortations. All through the winter he was writing to the people,
condoling with them for the exorbitant price of food, and attributing
all their evils to the continuance of wars in Europe. The Cabinet also
addressed the Dalesmen, urging them not to ally themselves with
Sunnanväder, who was disgruntled, so they heard, because he had not been
given the bishopric of Vesterås. In one of his appeals Gustavus warned
the rebels to be still, lest Christiern might be encouraged to return.
The spectre of their gory tyrant seems not, however, to have haunted
them, and in February we find that Knut, the deposed dean of Vesterås,
had joined their ranks. To him Gustavus wrote a note, assuring him that
the archbishopric would have been conferred upon him had he but done his
duty. Knut, apparently, did no great benefit to his brother's cause.
Only a few days after he arrived, his leader wrote archly to a person
who had loaned him funds, that he could stay no longer in the land, for
certain peasants were already on his track, intending to capture him and
take him to the king. If these suspicions were correct, it was probably
as well for him that he escaped. Some two weeks later these two
scoundrels were both in Norway, waiting for a more auspicious moment to
return.[112]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account