Switzerland; Switzerland -- Politics and government -- 1815-
and ordered to give the victim as many strokes with “_ochsenziemer_”
on the bare body, as the judges might think necessary, to loosen his
tongue or purge him of his offence. Another so-called truth-finder
(_wahrheitserforschungsmittel_) was a cage, in which one could neither
stand upright nor stretch his legs, but only cower on the floor in a
constrained position. At Freiburg the punishment for stealing five
sous was death by decapitation; and a stranger striking a burgher was
fastened to a post and scalped, while a burgher striking a stranger
paid three sous. Capital punishment was inflicted by cutting off the
head, which was done in this manner: the culprit was made fast in an
arm-chair, and a cap placed on his head with a hole in the top, by
which an assistant took hold of his hair, while the executioner, placed
behind, struck off his head with a broadsword.
There is little or nothing in the Swiss cantonal institutions to
tempt unworthy men into official life. The salaries are nominal, with
very remote chances for any personal aggrandizement. In the local and
municipal administrations, it is difficult, if not impossible, for any
one class to employ the powers of government for purely selfish ends.
Many of the officials serve the Canton, municipality, and community
with motives as honorable as their services are intelligent and
efficient. The Cantons and communities are comparatively free from
debt, and not burdened by excessive taxes. There is a general aversion
to incurring public debts, common to the Swiss, from the federal head
down through the cantonal, municipal, and community administrations.
The revenues of these little states are small, and require strict
economy in every branch of expenditure. Nothing is wasted on useless
consumers and their retainers; an exact account must be rendered of
the employment of the public funds; and precision and publicity in the
keeping of public accounts. The people yields its servants, indeed,
some compensation, but it does not reward them with pensions or with
superabundant influence. It builds up no official class who forget
their citizenship and separate themselves from the mass of the people,
squeezing as many advantages as possible out of their offices, even
to the prejudice of efficient service. The Cantons, upon enumeration,
number not twenty-two but twenty-five, because three of them have
been divided into half-Cantons, making nineteen whole and six half
Cantons. Basel is divided into Basel-Stadt and Basel-Landschaft (urban
and rural); Appenzell, into Ausser-Rhoden and Inner-Rhoden; and
Unterwalden, into Obwald and Nidwald (above and below the forests
which formed the boundary between them). The rending of these Cantons
into half-Cantons was the work of party feuds; in one place springing
from political causes, in a second from religious strife, and in the
third from wrangles about wood and grass. Unterwalden was divided
as early as 1366. The division of Appenzell occurred in 1597; the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account