The Sword of Honor; or, The Foundation of the French Republic: A Tale of The French RevolutionSue, Eugène
History
The Sword of Honor; or, The Foundation of the French Republic: A Tale of The French Revolution
Sue, Eugène
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799 -- Fiction
The sovereignty of the people being permanent, indivisible and
inalienable, the Constitution of 1791 was radically null and void, in
that it provided for the hereditary alienation of a portion of the
people's rights, in favor of the ex-royal family. The Conventionists of
1793 were no more in love with the Constitution of 1791 than the
Constituents of 1791 were with the monarchical, feudal and religious
institutions which had weighed like an incubus on France fourteen
centuries long.
A nation has the power, but never the right, to alienate its
sovereignty, either in whole or in part, by delegating it to a
hereditary family. Such an alienation, imposed amid the violence of
conquest, borne out of habits of thought, or consented to in a moment of
public aberration, binds neither the present generation nor those to
come. Accordingly, the Constitution of 1791 being virtually null in
fact, Louis Capet could not invoke the protection of that Constitution,
which guaranteed the inviolability of the royal person, and limited his
punishment to deposition in a few specified cases. Louis XVI was, then,
legally brought to trial. By reconquering its full sovereignty on the
10th of August, the nation invested the Convention with the powers
necessary for judging the one-time King. His crimes were notorious and
flagrant; their penalty was written in the books of the law, equally for
all citizens; he must, then, undergo the penalty for his misdeeds.
I, John Lebrenn, add here some further passages from my diary, relating
to the trial, judgment and execution of Louis Capet.
* * * * *
JANUARY 15, 1793.--Having heard the defense submitted by Deseze, one of
the attorneys for Louis XVI, the Convention put to a vote this first
question:
"Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against liberty and the nation, and
of assault on the general safety of the State?"
The Assembly contained seven hundred and forty-nine members.
Six hundred and eighty-three replied:
"Yes, the accused is guilty."
The roll-call being completed, the president of the Assembly announced
the decision:
"In the name of the French people, the National Convention declares
Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against liberty and the nation, and of
assault on the general safety of the State."
The second question was:
"Shall the decision of the National Convention be submitted to
ratification by the people?"
The members who voted for ratification by the people were two hundred
and eighty-one; those against ratification, four hundred and
twenty-three.
The president announced the result of the vote:
"The National Convention declares the judgment rendered on Louis Capet
shall not be sent for ratification to the people."
JANUARY 17, 1793.--To-day and yesterday the sessions of the Convention
were permanent, due to the gravity of the situation. The debate turned
upon the third question:
"What shall be the penalty imposed on Louis XVI?"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account