"The System," As Uncovered by the San Francisco Graft ProsecutionHichborn, Franklin
History
"The System," As Uncovered by the San Francisco Graft Prosecution
Hichborn, Franklin
Political corruption -- California -- San Francisco; San Francisco (Calif.) -- Politics and government
The names of the board of directors of the Home Telephone
Company, during the period of the bribery transactions, has
not, so far as the writer knows, been made public. A. C. Kains
resigned from the directorate of the United Railroads, and Jos.
S. Tobin from the directorates of the United Railroads and the
Pacific Gas and Electric Company, about the time of the
disclosures.
[188] The inconsistency of the "attorney fee plea" is well
illustrated in the United Railroads transaction. Ruef received
$200,000 from the United Railroads because of the trolley
permit. General Tirey L. Ford, head of the United Railroads
law department, to which he devoted all his time, was credited
with receiving a salary of $10,000 a year. Thus Ruef's single
"fee" was as much as the United Railroads would have paid its
head lawyer in twenty years, almost a lifetime of professional
service. And Ruef, it must be remembered, in addition was
getting $1,000 a month from the United Railroads--more than
the chief of that corporation's legal department was
receiving.
[189] Zimmer insisted at first that the total of the amounts which
he turned over to Halsey would not exceed $20,000. Later he
admitted that he had not kept track of the amounts, and the
total might have been $30,000. This he increased to $35,000,
and finally stated that it was "not over $40,000, if it was
that." He admitted that it would have been possible for
Executive Officer Glass to have paid out $70,000 without his
knowledge. "Checks," he said, "could have been signed without
going through me; could have been carried just the same as
this tag account was."
William J. Kennedy, cashier and assistant treasurer of the
company, who had charge of the "tags," stated that during
February, 1906, considerable amounts were drawn out in this
way, which might have totalled as high as $70,000.
[190] Regarding the manner in which money was furnished to Halsey,
Zimmer testified before the Grand Jury as follows:
"Q. This $10,000 that you gave him (Halsey) under direction of
Mr. Glass, in what shape did you hand it to him? A. Currency.
"Q. Did you have the currency on hand or send out and get it?
A. Sent out and got it. I went out and got it.
"Q. Where did you get it? A. I don't remember, I had to go to
several banks.
"Q. Did Mr. Glass tell you he wanted you to give it to him in
currency? A. Yes, sir."
[191] These admissions led to close questioning of Mr. Zimmer. The
following is taken from his testimony given before the Grand
Jury:
"Q. Now, in what way did that money appear in the books? A.
Didn't appear in the books.
"Q. How was it taken care of? A. No voucher was ever made for
it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account