"The System," As Uncovered by the San Francisco Graft ProsecutionHichborn, Franklin
History
"The System," As Uncovered by the San Francisco Graft Prosecution
Hichborn, Franklin
Political corruption -- California -- San Francisco; San Francisco (Calif.) -- Politics and government
At none of the Ford trials did the defense attempt to meet the evidence
which the prosecution presented. At the third trial, the prosecution
called President Calhoun and Abe Ruef[319] to the stand. But both
declined to answer. The disposition of the $50,000 in currency in small
bills, and of the $150,000 in currency in large bills, which passed into
General Ford's hands, at the time that currency of this exact amount and
description passed into the hands of Abe Ruef, $85,000 of which Ruef
distributed among the Supervisors for voting for the United Railroads
trolley permit, continues as great a mystery as it was on the day that
the first Ford trial opened. Ruef at the time of his plea of guilty to
the extortion charge, and five years later in the story of his career
published in the San Francisco Bulletin, admitted that the $200,000 that
on Calhoun's order was turned over to Ford was soon after paid to him
(Ruef) because of the granting of the trolley permit. The $85,000 that
Gallagher divided among the Supervisors on account of their granting
this permit, Ruef has stated in his several confessions, came out of
this Calhoun-to-Ford, Ford-to-Ruef $200,000.
And in California there are many who hold that in this instance, at
least, Ruef is telling the truth.
FOOTNOTES:
[294] John Helms, a detective, testified at the trial of Patrick
Calhoun that he had been employed by the United Railroads as
early as May 3, 1907; that his duties consisted of "mostly
shadow work, watching out for things being done by the
prosecution"; that Patrick Calhoun had himself authorized him
(Helms) to employ men to follow Burns on motorcycles. Later on
automobiles were substituted for the motorcycles.
If Helms's employment began on May 3, as he testified, the
United Railroads was preparing for its defense at least three
weeks before indictments were brought against its officials.
The extent of that corporation's defense, or the details of
it, are not known to those outside the corporation. At the
Calhoun trial the Prosecution accounted for every dollar spent
in the operations against the Schmitz-Ruef regime. The
attorneys representing the United Railroads were invited to
make as frank statement of the expenditures made by the
defense, but they declined.
[295] Ashe participated in the first Ford trials. At the time of the
later trials he was involved in the scandal of the alleged
kidnaping of Fremont Older.
[296] In referring to the men and women employed by the graft
defense, The Call, in an editorial article, in its issue of
September 26, said:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account