The Tale of the Great MutinyFitchett, W. H. (William Henry)
History
The Tale of the Great Mutiny
Fitchett, W. H. (William Henry)
India -- History -- Sepoy Rebellion, 1857-1858
In a moment there was a blast as of thunder, and—not the gate
unfortunately, but merely the little wicket in it, had vanished! The
bugler from the ditch sounded the advance; but such was the tumult of
battle now raging that the storming parties of the 52nd, waiting eagerly
to make their rush, heard neither the explosion nor the bugle-call.
Campbell, their colonel, however, had seen the flame of the explosion,
and gave the word. The storming party and the supports, all intermixed,
ran forward at the double, they crossed, man after man, the single beam
remaining of the bridge, and crept through the wicket. They found within
the gate an overturned cannon, and some blackened Sepoy corpses. The main
body followed, and from the two breaches and the Cashmere Gate the three
columns met, breathless, confused, but triumphant, in the open space
between the Cashmere Gate and the church.
The fourth column alone of the assaulting parties practically failed.
A battle is always rich in blunders; and the guns, which were to
have accompanied the column, somehow failed to arrive, and Reid, its
commander, pushed on without them. He had to face an unbroken wall 18
feet high, lined with guns and marksmen. Reid himself fell, wounded and
insensible, and there was some confusion as to who should take his place
as leader. It was expected that the Lahore Gate would have been opened
from within by the advance of the first column, but, before the Lahore
Gate was reached from within the city by the British, the fourth column
found itself unable to sustain the murderous fire from the walls, and
fell back into cover.
The Sepoys, in their exultation, actually ventured upon a sally, and Hope
Grant had to bring up the scanty cavalry of the camp to check the advance
of the enemy.
The cavalry could not charge, for this would bring them under the fire
of the walls; they would not withdraw, for this would uncover the camp.
They could only sit grimly in their saddles, and hold back the enemy by
the menace of their presence, while men and horses went down unceasingly
under the sleet of fire which broke over them. “For more than two
hours,” says Hodson, “we had to sit on our horses, under the heaviest
fire, without the chance of doing anything. My young regiment behaved
admirably, as did all hands. The slaughter was great. Lamb’s troop lost
twenty-seven men out of forty-eight, and nineteen horses, and the whole
cavalry suffered in the same proportion.”
Hope Grant tells how he praised the 9th Lancers for their cool
steadiness, and the men answered from the ranks that they were ready to
stand as long as he chose. “Hodson,” says one officer who was present,
“sat like a man carved in stone, apparently as unconcerned as the
sentries at the Horse Guards, and only by his eyes and his ready hand,
whenever occasion offered, could you have told that he was in deadly
peril, and the balls flying among us as thick as hail!”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account