THERE is nothing more astonishing in the history of mankind than the
high estimation in which credulity—under the form of belief—has been
held by all nations who have had the least claim to be civilised. Yet
the vast majority of the human race, mere slaves as they are to custom
and convention, imbibing their faith with their mother’s milk, and as
disinclined to change as a wheel that has found its rut, are absolutely
unable to be sceptical. This is probably why persecution has been so
lightly permitted—even among Christians, whose connivance at it is
otherwise unintelligible; those who suffered for their scepticism were
comparatively so few that their martyrdom was disregarded. It is an
immense recommendation to a creed, that the mere fact of accepting
it is accounted the highest virtue, since ninety-nine persons out of
a hundred who have been brought up in it, find no sort of difficulty
in fulfilling its chief obligation. With the same ease with which the
doctrines of Mahomet or of Buddha are embraced by their disciples,
had the story of the discovery of the Shakespeare manuscripts been
accepted by Mr. Samuel Erin. Nay, he had not been only a disciple but a
devotee. He had been looking forward all his life to some revelation of
a similar kind, and it had been manifested under circumstances that not
only corroborated his views, but flattered his _amour propre_. A member
of his own house had been the discoverer of the MSS., and he himself
their apostle and exponent. To confess, even to himself, that he had
been preaching a false faith, and been the dupe of a lying boy, seemed
impossible. The very idea of it was wormwood to him. Even the discovery
that Margaret had taken him at his word and left his roof did not at
first shake him. It even strengthened his suspicion that the whole
affair was a trick to catch his consent to her marriage with William
Henry. It was only done to frighten him into submission.
But as the solitary hours went by, this obstinate conviction began to
slacken; as his indignation grew and grew against the author of his
calamity, he began to admit that such a scoundrel might be capable
of anything, even sacrilege. It was the affront to the Immortal Bard
that he put first, and the offence to himself afterwards. Perhaps
William Henry was aware that he was not his son, but he was also aware
of the greatness of Shakespeare. And yet, what rankled more, was the
consciousness that his own intelligence had been trifled with—that he
had been made a fool of. It was a subject terrible to think about, and
worse to talk about, and yet he longed for sympathy; the solitude of
his own thoughts was intolerable to him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account