The Tallants of Barton, vol. 3 (of 3) : $b A tale of fortune and financeHatton, Joseph
General
The Tallants of Barton, vol. 3 (of 3) : $b A tale of fortune and finance
Hatton, Joseph
English fiction -- 19th century
It was as the detective had guessed, a case of sudden temptation. The
robbery had been committed just as he had suggested; but there was no
thirst for money for its own sake in poor Dibble’s wickedness. For
weeks and months he had brooded over his wife’s misfortunes; her taunts
had sunk deep into his heart; he was miserable beyond description to
think how she had been reduced; and all in a moment this bundle of
notes had seemed to offer him and his wife release from their troubles.
He had been sent to the bank to change a cheque. The notes were close
to his hand; he touched them; nobody was looking; he seized them, and
walked out of the bank as he came. Hurrying back to his master’s, he
gave the cheque to an under-servant, as though he had not had time to
go to the bank, and then after that one bit of cleverness, he made a
shambling excuse about an aunt in the country, and left Brazencrook.
Poor Dibble! He did nothing but moan about his poor dear wife,--his
poor injured wife.
This smart bit of police detection was destined to lead to more
important and startling results than the capture of Thomas Dibble,
otherwise we should not have narrated it so circumstantially.
CHAPTER XVI.
“BAL. TO R. T., £300.”
When Dibble was fairly locked up in the Brazencrook station, and Bales
had indulged in a quiet joke with the Brazencrook chief, he had the
curiosity to examine the roll of notes after Mr. Flooks had identified
them.
Two of these notes were new Bank of Englands, and were for £10 each.
At the back of one there were some figures in pencil,--a calculation
evidently of interest, and the result was carried down at the
corner--“Bal. to R. T., £300.” Then the figures had been run through
with the pencil, as though the writer had made a simple calculation of
moneys on the spur of the moment, and the sum showed a balance of £300
to “R. T.” Who was “R. T.”? Singular that these should be the initials
of the man who was murdered at Montem! Mere coincidence thought the
detective,--nothing in it; nevertheless, he would see Mr. Flooks again.
“Do you remember whether these notes were paid by the Severntown man in
the £300?” said the detective.
“I do not.”
“Yet you identified the bundle easily?”
“O yes, I could swear to the lot. But wait a moment; we will go into
the Treasury.”
And into the Treasury (as theatrical managers call the room occupied by
the cashier of the establishment) they went.
“You paid me a balance of petty receipts and other things yesterday
with the balance of the receipts of the night before.”
“Yes,” said the treasurer, “twenty pounds.”
“Did you pay me in these notes?”
“I think so; I am not quite sure.”
“Where did you get them?” asked the detective.
“From the bank. I changed your cheque for £30, for the purpose
of paying a poor-rate when you were away at Severntown,” said the
treasurer.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account