Great Britain. Army. Royal Tank Corps; Tanks (Military science)
Actual trials of the pontoons and their monitor escorts were made in
the secret waters of the Thames, and officers of the Tank Corps would
suddenly disappear on unknown missions, to reappear as suddenly with no
memory as to where they had been or what they had seen in the interval.
The sea wall itself might well have been designed as a special defence
against sea-borne hostile Tanks, its smooth concave face and projecting
coping making it absolutely unscalable by an honest Tank.
The wall was of recent construction, and by a fortunate chance the
Belgian architect who had designed it had escaped to France with all
his drawings.
From his plans an exact reproduction of a length of the wall was made.
There in the experimental ground it stood, perfectly smooth, and worst
of all, ending at the top in a curl-over coping.
At least, however, the engineers now knew the extent of their problem.
In the first place, the Tanks had to get up somehow, and in the second
place, when they were up they had to help haul up guns and transport
lorries.
After “trying on” various devices, the Tanks at last adopted what was
practically a portable ramp for the occasion.
The Tank, until it reached the sea wall, carried it well in the air on
a long spar supported by wire hawsers.
Then the ramp was lowered on to the pair of little wheels with which
it was fitted. On these the Tank pushed it up the incline, wheelbarrow
fashion, until further progress was stopped by the coping.
The two wheels were then immediately shed, and steel spikes on the
under side of the work were driven into the concrete by the weight of
the Tank, which now, disengaging itself, proceeded to climb up its own
scaling ladder which it had thus placed in position. But the lorries
and guns had still to be provided for.
The angle formed by the inclined plane and the level ground above the
retaining wall was a sharp one.
Besides, it must be understood that the inclined plane used by the
Tanks fitted in under the concrete lip. At the point of junction
between the ground and the inclined plane there was, therefore, a
considerable bump. Both the acuteness of the angle and this “bump”
made it necessary to adopt some less back-breaking device for the
four-wheeled vehicles. A strong gangway, like a see-saw, was therefore
employed, and up this they were hauled, the weight of the gun or lorry
gently tipping the board down when it passed the balancing point.
But the landing was never made, and for this many elaborate
explanations have been put forward.
Two circumstances seem, however, sufficient to explain the apparent
withdrawal of our hands from the plough.
The first was what seemed a trivial attack which the Germans made on
July 10.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account