or (_a_ - _b_)/(_b_ - _c_) = _ab_/_bc_ = _a_/_c_.
This is the reason why the line _AB_ is said to be divided
harmonically. The line _P__{1}_P__{2} is also called the
_harmonic mean_ between _AP__{2} and _P__{2}_B_, and the points
_A_, _P__{1}, _B_, _P__{2} are said to form an _harmonic
range_.
[Illustration]
It may be noted that [L]_P__{2}_CP__{1}, being made up of halves
of two supplementary angles, is a right angle. Furthermore, if
the ratio _CA_ : _CB_ is given, and _AB_ is given, then _P__{1}
and _P__{2} are both fixed. Hence _C_ must lie on a semicircle
with _P__{1}_P__{2} as a diameter, and therefore the locus of a
point such that its distances from two given points are in a
given ratio is a circle. This fact, Pappus tells us, was known
to Apollonius.
At this point it is customary to define similar polygons as such as have
their corresponding angles equal and their corresponding sides
proportional. Aristotle gave substantially this definition, saying that
such figures have "their sides proportional and their angles equal."
Euclid improved upon this by saying that they must "have their angles
severally equal and the sides about the equal angles proportional." Our
present phraseology seems clearer. Instead of "corresponding angles" we
may say "homologous angles," but there seems to be no reason for using
the less familiar word.
[Illustration]
[Illustration]
[Illustration]
It is more general to proceed by first considering similar figures
instead of similar polygons, thus including the most obviously similar
of all figures,--two circles; but such a procedure is felt to be too
difficult by many teachers. By this plan we first define similar sets of
points, _A__{1}, _A__{2}, _A__{3}, ..., and _B__{1}, _B__{2}, _B__{3},
..., as such that _A__{1}_A__{2}, _B__{1}_B__{2}, _C__{1}_C__{2}, ...
are concurrent in _O_, and _A__{1}_O_ : _A__{2}_O_ = _B__{1}_O_ :
_B__{2}_O_ = _C__{1}_O_ : _C__{2}_O_ = ... Here the constant ratio
_A__{1}_O_ : _A__{2}_O_ is called the _ratio of similitude_, and _O_ is
called the _center of similitude_. Having defined similar sets of
points, we then define similar figures as those figures whose points
form similar sets. Then the two circles, the four triangles, and the
three quadrilaterals respectively are similar figures. If the ratio of
similitude is 1, the similar figures become symmetric figures, and they
are therefore congruent. All of the propositions relating to similar
figures can be proved from this definition, but it is customary to use
the Greek one instead.
[Illustration]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account