The telephone, the microphone & the phonographDu Moncel, Th., comte
History
The telephone, the microphone & the phonograph
Du Moncel, Th., comte
Microphone; Phonograph; Telephone
This uncertainty as to the results obtained by the different physicists
who have studied the matter shows that at any rate the sounds thus
reproduced are not clearly defined, and that in physical phenomena,
only appreciable to our senses, the appreciation of an effect so
undefined must depend on the perfection of our organs. We shall
presently see that this very slight effect can be largely increased
by the arrangement adopted by Messrs. Bell and Gray, and we shall
also see that, by a certain mode of magnifying the vibrations, it
has been decisively proved that a telephone without a diaphragm can
readily reproduce speech. I proceed to give the description of such a
telephone, which was shown by Mr. Millar at the meeting of the British
Association at Dublin in August 1878.
This instrument consists of a small bar magnet, three inches in length
and 5/16 of an inch in width and thickness, and a copper helix (No. 30)
of about six mètres in length is wound round the bar. It is fixed in a
box of rather thick pasteboard, fitted above and below with two zinc
plates, which render it very portable. With a telephonic battery sender
and a single Leclanché cell, speech can be perfectly transmitted; the
whistling of an air, a song, and even the act of respiration become
audible. It seems also that the instrument can act without a magnet,
merely with a piece of iron surrounded by the helix; but the sounds are
then much fainter.
Signor Ignace Canestrelli obtained the same results by making one of
the carbon telephonic senders react on a telephone without a diaphragm,
by means of an induction coil influenced by two Bunsen cells. He writes
as follows on the subject:
‘With this arrangement I was able to hear the sound of any musical
instrument on a telephone without a diaphragm: singing, speaking, and
whistling were perfectly audible. Whistling could be heard, even when
the telephone without a diaphragm was placed at some distance from
the ear. In some cases, depending on the pitch of the voice, on the
distance of the sending station, and on the joint pressure exerted by
the carbons, I could even distinguish words.
‘I finally discharged the currents of the transmitter into the coils
of insulated copper wire with which the two poles of a magnet were
provided. This magnet was placed on a musical box, made of very thin
slips of wood, and on placing the ear at the opening of the box I
obtained the same results as with the ordinary telephones without a
diaphragm.’
M. Buchin, after repeating experiments of the same kind as the above,
intimates that it is easy to hear the sounds produced by a telephone
without a diaphragm, by introducing into the ear the end of an iron
rod, of which the other end is applied to the active pole of the bar
magnet of the telephone. (See ‘Le Journal d’Electricité,’ October 5,
1878.)
I repeat finally the account of some experiments made by Mr. Hughes and
M. Paul Roy which are interesting from our present point of view.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account