Nevertheless, the ferment of political and social life had seldom been
greater. A Royal wedding in the near future was supposed to account for
the vigor of London's social pulse; the streets, indeed, were already
putting up poles and decorations. And a general election, expected in
the autumn, if not before, accounted for the vivacity of the clubs, the
heat of the newspapers, and the energy of the House of Commons, where
all-night sittings were lightly risked by the Government and recklessly
challenged by the Opposition. Everybody was playing to the
gallery--_i.e._, the country. Old members were wooing their
constituencies afresh; young candidates were spending feverish energies
on new hazards, and anxiously inquiring at what particular date in the
campaign tea-parties became unlawful. Great issues were at stake; for
old parties were breaking up under the pressure of new interests and
passions; within the Liberal party the bubbling of new faiths was at
its crudest and hottest; and those who stood by the slow and safe
ripening of Freedom, from "precedent to precedent," were in much anxiety
as to what shape or shapes might ultimately emerge from a brew so strong
and heady. Which only means that now, as always, Whigs and Radicals were
at odds; and the "unauthorized programme" of the day was sending its
fiery cross through the towns and the industrial districts of the north.
A debate of some importance was going on in the House of Commons. The
Tory Government had brought in a Land Bill, intended, no doubt, rather
as bait for electors than practical politics. It was timid and
ill-drafted, and the Opposition, in days when there were still some
chances in debate, joyously meant to kill it, either by frontal attack
or by obstruction. But, in the opinion of the Left Wing of the party,
the chief weapon of its killing should be the promise of a much larger
and more revolutionary measure from the Liberal side. The powerful Right
Wing, however, largely represented on the front bench, held that you
could no more make farmers than saints by Act of Parliament, and that
only by slow and indirect methods could the people be drawn back to the
land. There was, in fact, little difference between them and the front
bench opposite, except a difference in method; only the Whig brains were
the keener; and in John Ferrier the Right Wing had a personality and an
oratorical gift which the whole Tory party admired and envied.
There had been a party meeting on the subject of the Bill, and Ferrier
and the front bench had, on the whole, carried the indorsement of their
policy. But there was an active and discontented minority, full of
rebellious projects for the general election.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account