The letters of that morning had brought him news of an important meeting
in Marsham's constituency, in which his leadership had been for the
first time openly and vehemently attacked. Marsham had not been present
at the meeting, and Lady Lucy had written, eagerly declaring that he
could not have prevented it and had no responsibility. But could the
thing have been done within his own borders without, at least, a tacit
connivance on his part?
The incident had awakened a peculiarly strong feeling in the elder man,
because during the early days of the recess he had written a series of
letters to Marsham on the disputed matters that were dividing the party;
letters intended not only to recall Marsham's own allegiance,
but--through him--to reach two of the leading dissidents--Lankester and
Barton--in particular, for whom he felt a strong personal respect
and regard.
These letters were now a cause of anxiety to him. His procedure in
writing them had been, of course, entirely correct. It is the business
of a party leader to persuade. But he had warned Oliver from the
beginning that only portions of them could or should be used in the
informal negotiations they were meant to help. Ferrier had always been
incorrigibly frank in his talk or correspondence with Marsham, ever
since the days when as an Oxford undergraduate, bent on shining at the
Union, Oliver had first shown an interest in politics, and had found in
Ferrier, already in the front rank, the most stimulating of teachers.
These remarkable letters accordingly contained a good deal of the
caustic or humorous discussion of Parliamentary personalities, in which
Ferrier--Ferrier at his ease--excelled; and many passages, besides, in
connection with the measures desired by the Left Wing of the party,
steeped in the political pessimism, whimsical or serious, in which
Ferrier showed perhaps his most characteristic side at moments of
leisure or intimacy; while the moods expressed in outbreaks of the kind
had little or no effect on his pugnacity as a debater or his skill as a
party strategist, in face of the enemy.
But, by George! if they were indiscreetly shown, or repeated, some of
those things might blow up the party! Ferrier uncomfortably remembered
one or two instances during the preceding year, in which it had occurred
to him--as the merest fleeting impression--that Oliver had repeated a
saying or had twisted an opinion of his unfairly--puzzling instances, in
which, had it been any one else, Ferrier would have seen the desire to
snatch a personal advantage at his, Ferrier's, expense. But how
entertain such a notion in the case of Oliver! Ridiculous!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account