The Theistic Conception of the World: An Essay in Opposition to Certain Tendencies of Modern ThoughtCocker, B. F. (Benjamin Franklin)
Religion
The Theistic Conception of the World: An Essay in Opposition to Certain Tendencies of Modern Thought
Cocker, B. F. (Benjamin Franklin)
Theism
3. The explicit declarations of Scripture are in perfect accord with
these inferences drawn from the nature of man and the idea of God. We
learn from the words of St. Paul that the aim of Divine providence is to
lead the race to the practical recognition of the personal dignity of
man as "the offspring of God;" to the practical recognition of the
universal brotherhood of man, as "of one blood," with equal rights to
place, provision, and free self-development in "every part of the
earth;" finally, to the practical recognition of our relation to God as
his dependent creatures, in fellowship with whom we have eternal
life.[364] God's great end in the whole course and discipline of
providence is to unite all men in bonds of mutual affection and aid, and
to unite the race to Himself in bonds of loyalty and love. Then
"whatsoever things are true and pure and honest and lovely and of good
report" will be revered and practiced among the nations of the earth.
These views of Divine providence can scarcely be said to have had any
place or any recognition in the ancient schools of philosophy. The
Stoics taught that an invincible necessity rules in the realm of history
as well as in the field of nature, to which God and man are equally
subject. "God is the reason of the world (τοῦ παντὸς τοῦ λόγου); the
laws of the world are as necessary as the laws of eternal reason. This
necessity is at once _fate_ (εἱμαρμένη), and the _providence_ (πρόνοια)
which governs all things."[365] The Epicureans reduced all existence to
the plane of mere physical nature, and represented humanity as a
development from the lower forms of life by the agency of blind,
unconscious force. If they recognized the existence of any god or gods,
they removed them far away from all intercourse with humanity, and all
supervision of or concern in human affairs. "They admitted their
existence in words," says Cicero, "but denied it in act." These two
forms of error are combined by the modern deniers of providence. Human
society, languages, laws, institutions, arts, sciences, are all the
products of matter and force. The succession of events, the progress of
civilization, and the religious phenomena of the world, have not been
determined by an intelligent Will, or presided over by a conscious
Personality. In the last analysis, matter is resolved into a function of
force, and a process of necessary evolution, which has no design and no
final purpose, is substituted for Divine providence. The ultimate
destination of the world and humanity is unknown, or, if conjecture is
permissible, is chaos and death.
In opposition to these cold and cheerless speculations Christianity
affirms the doctrine of Divine providence in human history.[366]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account