The Theistic Conception of the World: An Essay in Opposition to Certain Tendencies of Modern ThoughtCocker, B. F. (Benjamin Franklin)
Religion
The Theistic Conception of the World: An Essay in Opposition to Certain Tendencies of Modern Thought
Cocker, B. F. (Benjamin Franklin)
Theism
[Footnote 42: Dr. Whedon, _Meth. Qu. Review_, Jan. 9, 1871, p. 164.]
[Footnote 43: As related to the purpose of Redemption. God the Father is
the moving or actuating cause of Redemption, God the Son is the
revealing and actualizing cause, and God the Spirit is the active and
efficient cause. Father = Love; Logos = Revealer; Spirit = Life.]
[Footnote 44: The Justice, Truth, and Faithfulness of God are not
properly regarded as attributes of the Divine nature, but as modes of
Divine conduct or action, determined by the Holiness and Goodness of
God. So Grace, Mercy, Compassion are but modifications of Divine Love
viewed in relation to sinful, guilty, and suffering creatures, and their
consideration belongs not to the doctrine of Creation, but of
Redemption.]
[Footnote 45: Whedon, "On the Freedom of the Will," p. 316.]
[Footnote 46: For an exhaustive discussion of this subject, see Müller,
"Christian Doctrine of Sin," vol. ii. pp. 199-215.]
[Footnote 47: We make no pretensions to critical acquaintance with the
Hebrew, but will hazard this suggestion, עָשָׂה (aysah) is the most
general term; its fundamental meaning is _to do, to perform, to work_,
and may embrace both origination and formation. בָּרָא (bara) and יִצֶר
(yetsar) are more specific, the former denoting the origination of a
new essence or substance, the latter formation or fashioning out of
pre-existing materials. Thus we read in Gen. ii. 7: "And the Lord God
formed [יִצֶר] man [_i. e._, the body of man] out of the dust of the
earth." Here we have pre-existing matter. But in Gen. i. 27 we read,
"And God created [בָּרָא] man [_i. e._, the soul of man] in his own
image." Here we have no pre-existing material, for matter can not bear
the image of God. (See Acts xvii. 29.) _Bara_ must therefore here mean
origination. Even in Gen. i. 21, where _bara_ is employed in regard to
the production of _living creatures_, we have the origination of
something new: for _vitality_, _sensitivity_, _perception_ are not
properties of matter, neither can they be educed from any organization
of matter.]
[Footnote 48: We can not help regarding this mode of reasoning as
superficial and misleading. Gen. i. 27, "So God created [בָּרָא]
man in _his own image_," refers to the spiritual nature of man which
alone can bear the "image of God," and must mean _origination_. Gen. ii.
7, "And the Lord God formed [עָשָׂה] man out of the dust of the
earth," refers solely to the body of man. This distinction can scarcely
be accidental.]
[Footnote 49: James i. 17.]
[Footnote 50: Rom. xi. 36.]
[Footnote 51: Lange's "Commentary," Introduction.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account