The Theistic Conception of the World: An Essay in Opposition to Certain Tendencies of Modern ThoughtCocker, B. F. (Benjamin Franklin)
Religion
The Theistic Conception of the World: An Essay in Opposition to Certain Tendencies of Modern Thought
Cocker, B. F. (Benjamin Franklin)
Theism
| | ANIMALS and | and Aquatic | REPTILES, | |
| | BIRDS. | Reptiles and | BIRDS. | MESOZOIC. |
| | | Birds. | | |
|----+-------------+----------------+----------------+------------------|
| | Vers. 24-31.| Appearance of | Age of | |
|VI. | Creation of | Mammals and | MAMMALS. | CÆNOZOIC. |
| | LAND-ANIMALS| MAN. | | |
| | and MAN. | | | |
|----+-------------+----------------+----------------+------------------|
| |Gen. ii. 2,3.| Reign of Man. | Age of | |
|VII.| Sabbath | The Sabbath of | MAN. | PHRENOZOIC. |
| | of GOD. | Creation. | | |
+----+-------------+----------------+----------------+------------------+
2. Creation was _cumulative_--that is, it was a succession of beginnings
or creative epochs, in which new entities or new forces were inserted
into the already existing sphere of nature, carrying it forward toward a
nobler end.
This, we think, is the natural impression which the reading of Gen. i.
makes on the unbiased mind. Each creative word appears as the dynamical
basis of a real _principium_--a beginning of something intrinsically
new, and which can not be conceived as the physical result of any
pre-existing condition of things.[201] A new entity or a new force was,
as it were, inserted in the order of nature; a new impulse was given to
matter, or a new direction to existing forces, and from that initial
point a new series of developments, which go on in accordance with
law--a new succession of births and growths--flows on as a part of the
grand totality of effects we call "nature." This is, obviously, the
Biblical conception. Here creation does not present itself as a
necessary evolution from a first matter or a first force in unbroken
continuity, and without any supernatural interposition. Here are clearly
defined creative epochs, new beginnings, which have their origin in the
creative will and word of God. What these beginnings were is a question
of the deepest interest.
A careful study of Gen. i. and ii. has led us to the conclusion that
there is something fundamental and radical in the distinction between
the creative words with _bara_ (בָרָא) and those with _yetsar_ (יָצַר) and
_aysah_ (עָשָׂה). It is, in reality, the distinction between Origination
_de novo_ and Formation out of pre-existing materials. There are three
instances in which _bara_ occurs in Gen. i. We are fully convinced that
in each case it denotes the origination of a new entity--a real addition
to the sum of existence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account