"Sec. 120_d_. The police magistrates are empowered to enforce by order the carrying out in separate establishments of such measures as may appear to be necessary for the maintenance of the principles laid down in Sec. 120 to Sec. 120_c_, and such as may be compatible with the nature of the establishment. They may order that suitable rooms, heated in the cold season, shall be provided free of cost, in which the workers may take their meals outside the workrooms. A reasonable delay must be allowed for the execution of such orders, unless they be directed to the removal of a pressing danger threatening life or health. In establishments already existing before the passing of this Act only such orders shall be issued as may be necessary for the removals of grave evils dangerous to the life, health or morals of the workers, and only such as can be carried out without disproportionate expense: but this shall not apply to extensions or outbuildings hereafter added to the establishment. Appeal to a higher court of administration may be made within 3 weeks by the employer. "Sec. 120_e_. By order of the _Bundesrath_ directions may be issued showing what requirements may be necessary in certain kinds of establishments, for the maintenance of the principles laid down in Sec.Sec. 120_a_ to 120_e_. Where no such directions are issued by order of the _Bundesrath_, they may be issued by order of the Central Provincial Courts, or by police regulations of the courts empowered with such authority, under Sec. 81 of the Accident Insurance Act of July 6th, 1884." This formulary may be considered specially successful and almost conclusive. The insertion of the foregoing clauses in the general portion of chap. vii. of the Imp. Ind. Code Amendment Bill ensures such protection in occupation as is adequate to all necessities of life, to the whole body of industrial work included within the sphere of the Industrial Code. One item of Labour Protection in occupation might be supposed to consist in guarding against over-exertion, by means of the abolition of piece-work and "efficiency wage." But this claim, in so far as we find it prevailing in the Labour world, is made more on grounds of wage policy than as a necessary measure of protection. The economic advantages to the workers themselves of these methods of payment are so great that the abolition of "efficiency wage" is not, I think, required either on grounds of wage policy or of protective policy. We must, however, pass over the consideration of this question, whilst admitting that there is still a great deal to be done in this direction by means of free self-help and mutual help. (B) _Protection of intercourse in service, Truck Protection in particular._