The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.Smith, Adam
Philosophy
The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.
Smith, Adam
Ethics -- Early works to 1800; Language and languages -- Early works to 1800
themselves, at least in their own imagination, to the natural sentiments
of mankind, to be able to consider themselves as less worthy of hatred
and resentment, to atone in some measure for their crimes, and, if
possible, to die in peace and with the forgiveness of all their
fellow-creatures. Compared to what they felt before the discovery, even
the thought of this, it seems, was happiness.
CHAP. II.
_In what manner our own judgments refer to what ought to be the
judgments of others: and of the origin of general rules._
A great part, perhaps the greatest part, of human happiness and misery
arises from the view of our past conduct, and from the degree of
approbation or disapprobation which we feel from the consideration of
it. But in whatever manner it may affect us, our sentiments of this kind
have always some secret reference either to what are, or to what upon a
certain condition would be, or to what we imagine ought to be the
sentiments of others. We examine it as we imagine an impartial spectator
would examine it. If upon placing ourselves in his situation we
thoroughly enter into all the passions and motives which influenced it,
we approve of it by sympathy with the approbation of this supposed
equitable judge. If otherwise, we enter into his disapprobation and
condemn it.
Was it possible that a human creature could grow up to manhood in some
solitary place without any communication with his own species, he could
no more think of his own character, of the propriety or demerit of his
own sentiments and conduct, of the beauty or deformity of his own mind,
than of the beauty or deformity of his own face. All these are objects
which he cannot easily see, which naturally he does not look at; and
with regard to which he is provided with no mirror which can present
them to his view. Bring him into society, and he is immediately provided
with the mirror which he wanted before. It is placed in the countenance
and behaviour of those he lives with, which always mark when they enter
into, and when they disapprove of his sentiments; and it is here that he
first views the propriety and impropriety of his own passions, the
beauty and deformity of his own mind. To a man who from his birth was a
stranger to society, the objects of his passions, the external bodies
which either pleased or hurt him, would occupy his whole attention. The
passions themselves, the desires or aversions, the joys or sorrows,
which those objects excited, though of all things the most immediately
present to him, could scarce ever be the objects of his thoughts. The
idea of them could never interest him so much as to call upon his
attentive consideration. The consideration of his joy could in him
excite no new joy, nor that of his sorrow any new sorrow, though the
consideration of the causes of those passions might often excite both.
Bring him into society, and all his own passions will immediately become
the causes of new passions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account