The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.Smith, Adam
Philosophy
The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.
Smith, Adam
Ethics -- Early works to 1800; Language and languages -- Early works to 1800
alone is sufficient to secure happiness. Seneca, though a Stoic, the
sect most opposite to that of Epicurus, yet quotes this philosopher more
frequently than any other.
There are, however, some other systems which seem to take away
altogether the distinction between vice and virtue, and of which the
tendency is, upon that account, wholly pernicious: I mean the systems of
the duke of Rochefoucault and Dr. Mandeville. Though the notions of both
these authors are in almost every respect erroneous, there are, however,
some appearances in human nature which, when viewed in a certain manner,
seem at first sight to favour them. These, first slightly sketched out
with the elegance and delicate precision of the duke of Rochefoucault,
and afterwards more fully represented with the lively and humorous,
though coarse and rustic eloquence of Dr. Mandeville, have thrown upon
their doctrines an air of truth and probability which is very apt to
impose upon the unskilful.
Dr. Mandeville, the most methodical of those two authors, considers
whatever is done from a sense of propriety, from a regard to what is
commendable and praise-worthy, as being done from a love of praise and
commendation, or as he calls it from vanity. Man, he observes, is
naturally much more interested in his own happiness than in that of
others, and it is impossible that in his heart he can ever really prefer
their prosperity to his own. Whenever he appears to do so, we may be
assured that he imposes upon us, and that he is then acting from the
same selfish motives as at all other times. Among his other selfish
passions, vanity is one of the strongest, and he is always easily
flattered and greatly delighted with the applauses of those about him.
When he appears to sacrifice his own interest to that of his companions,
he knows that this conduct will be highly agreeable to their self-love,
and that they will not fail to express their satisfaction by bellowing
upon him the most extravagant praises. The pleasure which he expects
from this, over-balances, in his opinion, the interest which he abandons
in order to procure it. His conduct, therefore, upon this occasion, is
in reality just as selfish, and arises from just as mean a motive as
upon any other. He is flattered, however, and he flatters himself with
the belief that it is entirely disinterested; since, unless this was
supposed, it would not seem to merit any commendation either in his own
eyes or in those of others. All public spirit, therefore, all preference
of public to private interest, is, according to him a mere cheat and
imposition upon mankind; and that human virtue which is so much boasted
of, and which is the occasion of so much emulation among men, is the
mere offspring of flattery begot upon pride.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account