The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.Smith, Adam
Philosophy
The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.
Smith, Adam
Ethics -- Early works to 1800; Language and languages -- Early works to 1800
There is an affinity too between the desire of becoming what is
honourable and estimable, and the desire of honour and esteem, between
the love of virtue and the love of true glory. They resemble one another
not only in this respect, that both aim at really being what is
honourable and noble, but even in that respect in which the love of true
glory resembles what is properly called vanity, some reference to the
sentiments of others. The man of the greatest magnanimity, who desires
virtue for its own sake, and is most indifferent about what actually are
the opinions of mankind with regard to him, is still, however, delighted
with the thoughts of what they should be, with the consciousness that
though he may neither be honoured nor applauded, he is still the proper
object of honour and applause, and that if mankind were cool and candid
and consistent with themselves, and properly informed of the motives and
circumstances of his conduct, they would not fail to honour and applaud
him. Though he despises the opinions which are actually entertained of
him, he has the highest value for those which ought to be entertained of
him. That he might think himself worthy of those honourable sentiments,
and, whatever was the idea which other men might conceive of his
character, that when he should put himself in their situation, and
consider, not what was, but what ought to be their opinion, he should
always have the highest idea of it himself, was the great and exalted
motive of his conduct. As even in the love of virtue, therefore, there
is still some reference, though not to what is, yet to what in reason
and propriety ought to be, the opinion of others, there is even in this
respect some affinity between it, and the love of true glory. There is,
however, at the same time, a very great difference between them. The man
who acts solely from a regard to what is right and fit to be done, from
a regard to what is the proper object of esteem and approbation, though
these sentiments should never be bestowed upon him, acts from the most
sublime and godlike motive which human nature is even capable of
conceiving. The man, on the other hand, who while he desires to merit
approbation is at the same time anxious to obtain it, though he too is
laudably in the main, yet his motives have a greater mixture of human
infirmity. He is in danger of being mortified by the ignorance and
injustice of mankind, and his happiness is exposed to the envy of his
rivals, and the folly of the public. The happiness of the other, on the
contrary, is altogether secure and independent of fortune, and of the
caprice of those he lives with. The contempt and hatred which may be
thrown upon him by the ignorance of mankind, he considers as not
belonging to him, and is not at all mortified by it. Mankind despise and
hate him from a false notion of his character and conduct. If they knew
him better, they would esteem and love him. It is not him whom, properly
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account