The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.Smith, Adam
Philosophy
The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.
Smith, Adam
Ethics -- Early works to 1800; Language and languages -- Early works to 1800
What I have said concerning the preposition _of_, may in some measure be
applied to the prepositions, _to_, _for_, _with_, _by_, and to whatever
other prepositions are made use of in modern languages, to supply the
place of the ancient cases. They all of them express very abstract and
metaphysical relations, which any man, who takes the trouble to try it,
will find it extremely difficult to express by nouns substantive, in the
same manner as we may express the relation denoted by the preposition
_above_, by the noun substantive _superiority_. They all of them,
however, express some specific relation, and are, consequently, none of
them so abstract as the preposition _of_, which may be regarded as by
far the most metaphysical of all prepositions. The prepositions
therefore, which are capable of supplying the place of the ancient
cases, being more abstract than the other prepositions, would naturally
be of more difficult invention. The relations at the same time which
those prepositions express, are, of all others, those which we have most
frequent occasion to mention. The prepositions _above_, _below_, _near_,
_within_, _without_, _against_, &c. are much more rarely made use of, in
modern languages, than the prepositions _of_, _to_, _for_, _with_,
_from_, _by_. A preposition of the former kind will not occur twice in a
page; we can scarce compose a single sentence without the assistance of
one or two of the latter. If these latter prepositions, therefore, which
supply the place of the cases, would be of such difficult invention on
account of their abstractedness, some expedient, to supply their place,
must have been of indispensable necessity, on account of the frequent
occasion which men have to take notice of the relations which they
denote. But there is no expedient so obvious, as that of varying the
termination of one of the principal words.
It is, perhaps, unnecessary to observe, that there are some of the cases
in the ancient languages, which, for particular reasons, cannot be
represented by any prepositions. These are the nominative, accusative,
and vocative cases. In those modern languages, which do not admit of any
such variety in the terminations of their nouns substantive, the
correspondent relations are expressed by the place of the words, and by
the order and construction of the sentence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account