The Theosophical Path Illustrated Monthly Volume 1, July-December, 1911
Religion
The Theosophical Path Illustrated Monthly Volume 1, July-December, 1911
Theosophy -- Periodicals
A man of science has presented to the Paris Academy of Sciences a paper
in which he attempts to prove from the results of certain experiments
that the atoms of magnetic bodies, such as iron and manganese, contain
definite quantities of an elementary magnetic _substance_, which he
proposes to call "magneton." This is regarded as a sequel to the new
way of regarding electricity; for in the electrons we now seem to
find a means of defining electricity in terms of a unit of substance.
Electricity, light, and other physical forces, have at different times
been defined either as kinds of matter or as modes of motion. At the
present moment, many people think, we are passing from the kinetic to
the corpuscular view again. But it is more likely that our present
studies will end by giving us a more accurate and adequate notion of
the nature of force on the one hand and matter on the other. We shall
see more clearly that force and matter are inseparable, and that in
our use of these words we are merely making mental abstractions for
the purpose of calculation. What was at one time considered to be
inert matter was later found to be teeming with energy; so that this
kind of matter, instead of being inert substance, was found to be the
result of forces acting in some finer kind of matter. This finer kind
of matter--hypothetical so far--was denominated "ether"; and should
we succeed in examining this ether, we should probably find that it
too is the result of forces acting in a still more recondite form of
matter--a sub-ether, as it were. At all events we should have no choice
but to describe it in that way. In the same way force must always be
inseparably associated with mass, for the quantity denoted by the
term "mass" is included in the definition of force. Thus the question
whether electricity, magnetism, etc., are "forces" or "forms of matter"
loses its meaning, since (strictly speaking) they cannot be either but
must be both.
The experiments mentioned seem to have shown that there is a definite
physical unit of quantity for magnetism, just as the negative electron
is said to be a definite unit of quantity for negative electricity.
In this case we should have arrived at the conclusion that magnetic
substances are those to whose atoms or molecules are attached these
magnetic atoms.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account