Detective and mystery stories; England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century -- Fiction; Murder -- Investigation -- Fiction
"Again, from the statement of Dick Pental, it would appear that the
murder took place in the garden; your mother says it was committed in
the sitting room, so here is another contradiction. But you must not
forget that only one person has sworn to the identity of those he saw
with the body. Miss Pike can prove nothing from facts, and only evolves
accusations out of her own malignant nature. Your mother accuses no one,
alleging that she fainted in the sitting room. Therefore, taking all
facts into consideration, I believe the gardener's story to be true, and
that Denis Bantry killed your father; Jeringham, through force of
circumstances, being an accessory to the deed. This view accounts for
the identity of Paynton with Jeringham, of Kerry with Denis--and fully
accounts for their living in seclusion at Thorston. This is my opinion.
Do you think you can give a better?
"Regarding your mother's hint about Louisa Sinclair, I confess I cannot
understand it. Miss Pike was perfectly frank about that person; and
stated that shortly after the murder she went to America and had not
been heard of for years. Hilliston may know of her whereabouts, but
under the circumstances I do not think he is likely to speak. At all
events we are certain of two things: that Louisa Sinclair did not marry
Hilliston; that she had nothing to do with the tragedy at The Laurels.
Miss Pike intends to show me a portrait of the lady on the occasion of
my next visit. A knowledge of her looks may lead to something; but
honestly speaking I do not see how she can possibly be implicated in the
matter.
"But I must bring this long letter to a close. I have found out
sufficient at Horriston to justify our suspicions of the _ménage_ at
Rose Cottage, and when I return we must set our wits to work to see
Paynton and Kerry. They must be forced into plain speaking, then we may
solve the mystery of your father's death--not before. Expect me in two
days, and think over what I have written so that we may discuss the
matter thoroughly when we come together. And so no more at present from
your friend,
"SPENSER TAIT."
CHAPTER XXXV.
THE ORIGINAL OF THE PORTRAIT.
CLAUDE LARCHER was blessed with the best of tempers, and strongly gifted
with self-control. He found these virtues very necessary in his
profession, especially when in command of a body of men in the wilds.
There no trouble ruffled him, no disappointment depressed his spirits;
he was always serene and amiable, so that among his comrades his good
temper had become proverbial. Had they seen him at this moment they
would have found reason to alter their opinion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account