Detective and mystery stories; England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century -- Fiction; Murder -- Investigation -- Fiction
"That I cannot say. Unless," here Tait hesitated before uttering his
opinion, "unless Denis Bantry is the guilty person."
"But that is impossible; that is out of the question," said Claude
decidedly. "He was devoted to my father, as you know. Why should he turn
and kill him without a cause?"
"Ah!" said Tait significantly; "what if he had a cause, and a very good
one, to kill your father. Recall your mother's confession. She returned
at three o'clock in the morning and found her husband alone with Mona,
the sister of Denis. She accused Mona of being her husband's mistress,
and the girl confessed her guilt, which your father evidently could not
deny. Now what is more probable than that Denis, attracted by the high
voices, should have followed your mother to the room. There he would
hear the truth, probably while waiting at the door. What follows? With
his impulsive Irish temperament he dashes in, hot to avenge the wrong
done to his sister. The dagger dropped by your mother is at his feet; he
picks it up and kills his master on the instant. Your mother, in a faint
on the floor, knows nothing of what is going on, and brother and sister
remove the body to the river, where they drop it in. Then Mona is sent
away by Denis to hide her shame and evade awkward questions, while he
remains."
"But why should he remain?" interrupted Claude smartly. "Would it not
have been wiser for him to fly?"
"And so confess his guilt. No! He induces Jeringham to fly, with a
threat of denouncing him as the murderer of Larcher. Jeringham is in
such a dilemma that, seeing that all the evidence will be against him,
he takes to flight. Thereupon Denis is able to save his mistress, and
himself, by denying that Larcher came to the house on that night. Of
course, this is all pure theory; still it is as circumstantial as the
rest of the evidence we have in hand."
But Claude was by no means inclined to agree with this last remark.
"There are flaws in your argument," he said, after a few moments'
reflection. "If Denis intended to deny that my father was in the house
on that night, why should he induce Jeringham to fly?"
"To make assurance doubly sure. No doubt he intended first to put the
blame on Jeringham, but finding that Mrs. Larcher was likely to be
accused, he made things safe for her by denying that his master returned
on that evening. Only four people knew of the return; Mona, who fled,
Mrs. Larcher, who held her tongue to save her neck; Denis, who swore
falsely to serve his mistress; and Jeringham, who thought he might be
accused of the crime."
"But why wouldn't he have denounced Denis?"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account