The Thirteenth Hussars in the Great WarDurand, H. Mortimer (Henry Mortimer)
History
The Thirteenth Hussars in the Great War
Durand, H. Mortimer (Henry Mortimer)
Great Britain. Army. Hussars, 13th; World War, 1914-1918 -- Regimental histories -- Great Britain
At all other times, and indeed at all times, the rivers themselves
were the chief means of communication for troops and supplies; and
boats of any carrying power were few. Even when armed movement on
land was possible, any advance against an enemy in position was a
formidable task, for the flat ground afforded not a vestige of cover,
and troops had often to go forward to the assault of trenches over
ground as smooth and bare as a billiard-table, perhaps up to their
knees in mud, with deep swamps on each side preventing any attempt at a
turning movement. Mud, indeed, proved to be a more formidable obstacle
than mountains and ravines. Troops could not advance over it with any
freedom or swiftness, and they could not camp in it without misery and
loss; nor could they be fed in large numbers, for it made the transport
of supplies very difficult. Then the whole country, though not really
friendly to the Turks, was inhabited by Arabs who were anything but
friendly to an invader. Whether in the marshy lands near the rivers or
on the dry plains beyond, they were always hanging on the flanks of
an advancing or retreating force, their desert horsemen as elusive as
the “web-footed” men of the marshes, swift to gather and as swift to
vanish in the mirage of an enchanted land where all seemed fantastic
and unreal. With stubborn Turkish soldiery, organised by Germans,
intrenched in large numbers along the river lines, and supported by
larger numbers of these irregular auxiliaries on every side, the
country was no easy field of action for a British army.
Nevertheless, in spite of all difficulties of climate and ground, the
British expeditionary force had by the autumn of 1915 established
itself in control of the river mouths, with a considerable Turkish
province in its hands. Then, in an evil hour, came the decision to
advance on Baghdad, and a single British Division was pushed forward.
It was a very daring if not an insane project, and it failed. Before
the end of the year the unfortunate Division found itself besieged by
superior forces at Kut-el-Amara, and in the following April, after a
siege of five months, a starving British force of more than 10,000
men, nearly 3000 of them white men, was marched away by the Turks into
bitter captivity.
This was the heaviest blow that had ever been dealt to British arms and
British prestige in Asia. Not only had 10,000 men been taken prisoners,
but the Turks had inflicted upon other British forces trying to relieve
them a series of bloody repulses. Struggling forward, time after
time, with splendid devotion over the muddy flats, in vain attempts
to drive from strong lines of trenches an enemy superior in numbers,
our soldiery, white and black, had lost over 20,000 men in killed and
wounded, and had been forced to admit that for the time they could do
no more. The Turks had won a striking success, the measure of which to
Great Britain was the loss of an Army Corps.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account