The Three Voyages of Captain Cook Round the World. Vol. IV. Being the Second of the Second Voyage.Cook, James
History
The Three Voyages of Captain Cook Round the World. Vol. IV. Being the Second of the Second Voyage.
Cook, James
Cook, James, 1728-1779 -- Travel; Explorers -- Great Britain -- Biography; Voyages around the world -- History -- 18th century
When the boats returned, Mr. Cooper informed me, that they had landed on
the beach which is at the head of the bay, near a fine river, or stream
of fresh water, so large and deep, that they judged boats might enter it
at high water. They found three fathoms depth close to the beach, and
fifty-five and fifty, two cables’ length off. Farther out they did not
sound; and where we were with the ship we had no soundings with an
hundred and seventy fathoms line. Before the boats got on board, the
wind had shifted to S. S. E. As we were in want of nothing, and had no
time to spare, I took the advantage of this shift of wind, and steered
down the bay. During the fore-part of the night, the country was
illuminated with fires, from the sea-shore to the summits of the
mountains; but this was only on the west side of the shore. I cannot
pretend to say what was the occasion of these fires, but have no idea of
their being on our account. Probably they were burning or clearing the
ground for new plantations. At day-break, on the 27th, we found
ourselves two-thirds down the bay; and, as we had but little wind, it
was noon before we were the length of the N. W. point, which at this
time bore N. 82° West, distant five miles. Latitude observed, 14° 39ʹ
30ʺ.
Some of our gentlemen were doubtful of this being the bay of St. Philip
and St. Jago, as there was no place which they thought could mean the
port of Vera Cruz. For my part, I found general points to agree so well
with Quiros’s description, that I had not the least doubt about it. As
to what he calls the port of Vera Cruz, I understand that to be the
anchorage at the head of the bay, which in some places may extend
farther off than where our boats landed. There is nothing in his account
of the port which contradicts this supposition.[8] It was but natural
for his people to give a name to the place, independent of so large a
bay, where they lay so long at anchor. A port is a vague term, like many
others in geography, and has been very often applied to places far less
sheltered than this.
Our officers observed that grass and other plants grew on the beach
close to high-water mark; which is always a sure sign of pacific
anchorage, and an undeniable proof that there never is a great surf on
the shore. They judged that the tide rose about four or five feet, and
that boats and such craft might, at high water, enter the river, which
seemed to be pretty deep and broad within; so that this, probably, is
one of those mentioned by Quiros; and, if we were not deceived, we saw
the other.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account