The Tower of London, (Vol. 1 of 2)Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
History
The Tower of London, (Vol. 1 of 2)
Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
Tower of London (London, England)
Henry, with his love of show and splendour, gave himself and Catherine
a gorgeous wedding ceremony. They had held their court at the Tower
previous to their nuptials, and on the 21st of June the wedding took
place. Never had the English court made so magnificent a show as at
this time. The costumes of the men vied in splendour with those of the
women, and many of the great nobles literally bore their fortunes upon
their backs. The King blazed in a habit of crimson velvet, lined with
ermine and covered with diamonds, rubies, emeralds, and other gems.
And as he rode through the streets, bareheaded, on a charger arrayed
in damasked cloth of gold, he was surrounded and followed by a suite
of knights and nobles, all in crimson velvet or scarlet cloth, Sir
Thomas Brandon, the Master of the Horse, being the most splendid figure
in the procession next to the King. Brandon, the chronicler tells us,
was arrayed in “tissue broudered with roses of fine gold, and having
a massy balderick of gold.” He led the King’s spare horse by a silken
rein, “trapped barde wise, with harneis broudered with bullion golde,”
and he was followed by nine children of honour, “apparelled in blewe
velvet, poudered with floure delices of gold and chains of goldsmithes
woorke, every one of their horses trapped with a trapper of the King’s
title.”
The Queen’s cortege was no less magnificent. Catherine was seated in a
chariot drawn by two white palfreys, and was attired “in white satyn
embroidered, her heire hangyng downe to her backe, and on her hedde
a coronall, set with many rich orient stones.” She was followed by a
crowd of ladies riding white palfreys, dressed in cloth of gold and
silver, these again being followed by an army of attendants.
The coronation was soon followed by executions; Henry seems to have
required blood-shedding as a kind of relaxation, and to have caused
it to flow with as much delight as he participated in the pomps and
splendours of his regal state. His next victim, after Empson and
Dudley, was Edmund de la Pole, Earl of Suffolk. Although the only crime
that could be brought against him was his consanguinity to the Blood
Royal of the Plantagenets, it was quite a sufficient excuse for the
King, and Suffolk was beheaded in 1513. He had been born in 1464, his
father being John de la Pole, Duke of Suffolk, and his mother Elizabeth
Plantagenet, daughter of Richard, Duke of York, consequently he was
of the Blood Royal by his mother’s side, and, through her, nephew to
Edward IV. and Richard III. Edmund de la Pole had surrendered the
Dukedom of Suffolk in 1493, but was attainted in 1504, imprisoned
in the Tower in 1506, and executed seven years later. “Audacious,
strong and prompt in council” is the character given to Suffolk by a
contemporary writer. The title of Duke of Suffolk was bestowed by Henry
upon his brother-in-law, Charles Brandon, who had made such a fine
figure at his marriage.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account