The Tower of London, (Vol. 1 of 2)Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
History
The Tower of London, (Vol. 1 of 2)
Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
Tower of London (London, England)
Knighton’s wife, whose husband was the Constable of the Tower, was set
to watch the Queen, and repeat all she said to her husband, who was in
correspondence with Cromwell. In writing to the latter, Knighton says
that Lady Boleyn (Anne’s aunt) and a “Mestrys Cosyn” were kept in
the same room with the Queen; both of these ladies were Anne’s bitter
enemies, and they acted as spies upon the unhappy prisoner. “I have,”
writes Knighton, “everything told me by Mestrys Cosyn that she thynks
mete for me to knowe.”
The trial was held in the large room, called at that time the King’s
Hall, which is on the second floor of the White Tower, adjoining the
Chapel of St John’s. Here a gallery had been erected for the judges,
and seats and benches for the Lords. The Duke of Norfolk, who presided,
sat under the “clothe of estate,” and represented the King as High
Steward of England. By a singular coincidence Norfolk was uncle to both
Anne Boleyn and the second wife whom Henry beheaded, Catherine Howard.
At Norfolk’s feet sat his son, the Earl of Surrey, both holding staffs
in their hands—Norfolk that of the Lord High Steward, Surrey that of
Earl Marshal. On the Duke’s right hand sat the Lord Chancellor, and on
his left the Duke of Suffolk, the peers occupying seats on either side
of the chamber, in the order of their degree. Led by the Constable of
the Tower and the Lieutenant (Sir Edmund Walsingham), the Queen was
brought to the bar. Anne Boleyn’s defence was admirable, and must have
greatly disconcerted her judges, who knew that no defence, however
convincing, could avail her; she was already sentenced by the King.
Not one of these men, with their high-sounding names and titles, dared
to give their vote in her favour. All, to a man, declared on their
consciences that the Queen was guilty. Surely some of the innocent
blood counted against these noble cowards as well as against their
master, when their day of reckoning arrived. Norfolk, whose tears
appear always to have been at command, wept “so that the water,” writes
Constantyne in his Memorial, “roune in his eyes,” when he pronounced
the sentence, which ran thus: “Because thou hast offended our
Sovereign the King’s Grace, in committing treason against his person,
and here attainted of the same, the law of the realm is this; that thou
shalt be burnt here within the Tower of London, on the Green, else to
have thy head smitten off as the King’s pleasure shall be further known
of the same.”[9]
According to Froude, Anne Boleyn’s trial was conducted “with a
scrupulousness without a parallel in the criminal history of the time.”
One can only wonder what kind of a trial that would be which was not
conducted with the “scrupulousness” that characterised the proceedings
in the King’s Hall, under the Duke of Norfolk, when Anne Boleyn was
condemned to die.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account