The Tower of London, (Vol. 1 of 2)Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
History
The Tower of London, (Vol. 1 of 2)
Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
Tower of London (London, England)
On the 2nd of March it passed the
Commons, and three days later received the royal assent; on the 15th,
Goodriche, Bishop of Ely, communicated to Seymour that he was to suffer
death on the 20th.
The Protector has naturally been greatly blamed for the part he took in
bringing his brother to the scaffold, and there is a curious passage
in a letter written by the Princess Elizabeth to her sister Queen
Mary, shortly after she herself was sent a prisoner to the Tower, in
which she says, “In late days I hearde my Lorde Somerset say, that if
his brother had bine suffered to speke to him, he had never suffered;
but the persuasions were made to him so gret, that he was brought in
beleafe that he could not live safely if the admirall lived; and that
made him give his consent to his dethe.” The young King’s entry in
his diary regarding his uncle’s death is extremely laconic: “The Lord
Sudley, admiral of England, was condemned to death, and died in March
ensuing.” Burnet in his “History” says, “What his behaviour was on the
scaffold I do not find,” and indeed no record, as was the case with
so many of his distinguished contemporaries, has come down to us of
his last moments, except that Strype in his “History” says, that just
before the end the Admiral bade his servant, “speed the thing that he
wot of.”
This last message appears to have regarded two letters which he had
written in the Tower, one to the Princess Elizabeth, and the other to
the Princess Mary. They had been written in some kind of invisible ink,
and, having no pen, he had written them with the point of an “uglet”
which “he had plucked from his hose,” and they had been sewn between
the sole of one of his velvet shoes. “By this means these letters
came to light, and fell into the hands of the Protector and Council.
The contents of these tended to this end, that the two sisters should
conspire together against the Protector, enforcing many matters against
him, to make these ladies jealous of him, as though he had, it may be,
estranged the King their brother from them, or to deprive them of the
right of their succession. Both these papers Latimer himself saw, and
repeated publicly in his fourth sermon before the King, though in the
last edition of his sermons the passage is left out.” The following,
however, is the passage from Latimer’s most strange discourse on the
death of the Lord High Admiral, which he preached before the King
regarding his uncle’s death; a less charitable or courtly address is
not often met with: “As touching the kind of his death, whether he be
saved or no, I refer that to God. In the twinkling of an eye He may
save a man or turn his heart. What he did I cannot tell, and when a man
hath two strokes with an axe, who can tell but between two strokes he
doth repent? It is hard to judge, but this I will say, if they will ask
me what I think of his death, that he died very dangerously, irksomely
and horribly. He was a wicked man and the realm is well rid of him”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account