The Tower of London, (Vol. 2 of 2)Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
History
The Tower of London, (Vol. 2 of 2)
Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
Tower of London (London, England)
Whilst this work of demolishing was being carried out, an interesting
discovery was made, Roman tiles and mortar being found, worked up
into the materials of which these walls were built. At the south-east
corner, and adjoining the remains of the Wardrobe Tower, a portion of
Roman wall was disclosed, having three courses of bonded tiles showing
above the surface of the _débris_. This piece of wall is in a direct
westerly line with the old city wall, shown in a plan of the Tower made
in 1597, the demolished buildings likewise appearing on this plan,
which can be seen in the office of the Commissioners of Works. Two
inferences are possible from the discovery of this Roman work; either
it is part of the old city wall or the remains of a Roman building, and
if it is satisfactorily proved to be Roman, it will practically settle
the contested point as to whether there was ever a Roman fortress on
the site of the White Tower or not. Holinshed, in the third Book of his
history of England, quoting both Leyland and Fabyan, says, that Belins,
who began to reign conjointly with Brennus as King of Britain, which
was “about the seventh year of Artaxerxes, the seventh king of the
Persians, builded a haven with a gate within the city of Troinovant,
now called London. This gate was long after called Belins gate, and
at length, by corruption of language, Billingsgate. He builded also a
castle westward from this gate (as some have written) which was long
time likewise called Belins Castell, and is the same which we now call
the Tower of London.” It was pointed out in the first volume of this
work that Fitzstephen declared the White Tower to have been built by
Julius Cæsar, and that the mortar used in the building was “tempered
with the blood of beasts,” but the Roman habit of mixing powdered tiles
with their mortar, may have given rise to this theory. Stowe, in his
survey of London about 1076, says, that William the Conqueror caused
the present White Tower to be erected at the south-east angle of the
city wall, which would be the actual spot where the fragment of the
recently discovered Roman wall now stands.
On removing the southern wall of this building, it was found that it
was built up to, and not bonded into the south-east turret of the White
Tower, which forms the apse of St John’s Chapel. When it was taken
down, the original stone-work of the White Tower was laid bare. It is
quite honeycombed by age, Sir Christopher Wren having, of course, been
unable to reface it as he did the exposed portions of the Tower.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account